Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 114.441 (2026)

Definitions for ORS 114.441 to 114.462

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      114.441 Definitions for ORS 114.441 to 114.462. As used in ORS 114.441 to 114.462:

      (1) “Beneficiary” means a person for whose benefit an action against a wrongdoer may be brought under ORS 30.020.

      (2) “Interested person” has the meaning given that term in ORS 111.005.

      (3) “Personal injury claim” means a cause of action arising out of injuries to a decedent, caused by the wrongful act or omission of another, that do not result in the death of the decedent.

      (4) “Wrongful death claim” means a cause of action arising out of injuries to a decedent, caused by the wrongful act or omission of another, that result in the death of the decedent. [2019 c.166 §1]

 

      Note: 114.441 to 114.462 were enacted into law by the Legislative Assembly but were not added to or made a part of ORS chapter 114 or any series therein by legislative action. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2026–2026 · leading case: In re Ersoff, 375 Or. 43 (Or. 2026).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Ersoff, 375 Or. 43 (Or. 2026). “It may be that respondent should have known that there was a risk the judge handling the probate petition would be unaware of the existing challenged will, but RPC 9 Although not applicable here, certain statutes (ORS 114.441 to ORS 114.462) contemplate the opening of a “no…”
In re Ersoff, 375 Or. 43 (Or. 2026). “It may be that respondent should have known that there was a risk the judge handling the probate petition would be unaware of the existing challenged will, but RPC 9 Although not applicable here, certain statutes (ORS 114.441 to 114.462) contemplate the opening of a “no assets”…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.