Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 130.001 (2026)

UTC 101. Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      130.001 UTC 101. Short title. This chapter may be cited as the Oregon Uniform Trust Code. [2005 c.348 §1]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2016–2025 · leading case: Wade Harvey, Ex Rel. Alexis Breanna Gladden v. Cumberland Trust & Inv. Co., 532 S.W.3d 243 (Tenn. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wade Harvey, Ex Rel. Alexis Breanna Gladden v. Cumberland Trust & Inv. Co., 532 S.W.3d 243 (Tenn. 2017). “03 (2007); Or. Rev. Stat. §§ 130.001 to 130.910 (2011); 20 Pa.”
Carter v. Smith, 346 Or. App. 5 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “As explained below, we conclude that, notwithstanding the court’s use of the term “partition” in its findings regarding the property division, it ordered the division under the Uniform Trust Code (UTC), ORS 130.001 to 130.910, as a remedy for multiple breaches of trust by Smith.”
Wade Harvey, Ex Rel. Alexis Breanna Gladden v. Cumberland Trust & Inv. Co. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017). “03 (2007); Or. Rev. Stat. §§ 130.001 to 130.910 (2011); 20 Pa.”
Wade Harvey, Ex Rel. Alexis Breanna Gladden v. Cumberland Trust & Inv. Co. (Tenn. 2017). “03 (2007); Or. Rev. Stat. §§ 130.001 to 130.910 (2011); 20 Pa.”
Hannah v. Washington Cnty. Assessor (Or. T.C. 2016). “ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN PART TC-MD 150449N 3 The Department argues that the trust became irrevocable after the death of Ray Hannah in 1999, and therefore, the subject property no longer qualifies for Homestead Deferral.”
US Bank NA v. Glogowski Law Firm (W.D. Wash. 2021). “) Specifically, they argue that the property passed directly to 11 the revocable trust upon the grantor’s death, such that the estate had no interest in the property 12 and, therefore, there was no need to name the estate in the foreclosure proceeding.”
Carter v. Smith, 346 Or. App. 5 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “As explained below, we conclude that, notwithstanding the court’s use of the term “partition” in its findings regarding the property division, it ordered the division under the Uniform Trust Code (UTC), ORS 130.001 to 130.910, as a remedy for multiple breaches of trust by Smith.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.