Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 131.205 (2026)

Definition for ORS 131.205 to 131.235

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      131.205 Definition for ORS 131.205 to 131.235. As used in ORS 131.205 to 131.235, “this state” means the land and water and the airspace above the land and water with respect to which the State of Oregon has legislative jurisdiction. [1973 c.836 §13]

 

      131.210 [Repealed by 1973 c.836 §358]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1985–2023 · leading case: State v. Rose, 330 P.3d 680 (Or. Ct. App. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Rose, 330 P.3d 680 (Or. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “580(2), criminal process authorizing or commanding the seizure or production of papers, documents, records or other things may be issued to a recipient, regardless of whether the recipient or the papers, documents, records or things are located within this state, if: “(a) The…”
State v. Williams, 530 P.3d 919 (Or. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “g conviction based on continued possession of sto- len property in Oregon where taking occurred out of state; disagreeing with states holding “that the offense would not continue if the original taking was without the State, as the offense would be beyond the jurisdiction of…”
State v. Self, 706 P.2d 975 (Or. Ct. App. 1985). “” And, finally, Oregon’s criminal jurisdiction statutes, ORS 131.205 etseq, provide, in ORS 131.215: “[A] person is subject to prosecution under the laws of this state for an offense that he commits by his own conduct or the conduct of another for which he is criminally liable…”
Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. Deparment of Revenue, 769 P.2d 193 (Or. 1989). “7 See ORS 131.205 and 131.215(1). See also ORS 493.”
State v. Williams (Or. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “g conviction based on continued possession of sto- len property in Oregon where taking occurred out of state; disagreeing with states holding “that the offense would not continue if the original taking was without the State, as the offense would be beyond the jurisdiction of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.