Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 131A.270 (2026)

Consolidation of actions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      131A.270 Consolidation of actions. (1) A forfeiture action may be consolidated with any other action that relates to the same property or parties on motion by any party in the forfeiture action.

      (2) Upon motion by the state or other public body, or any criminal defendant who is also a claimant, a forfeiture action under this section may be consolidated for trial or other resolution with any related criminal proceeding. Trial or other resolution of the forfeiture action shall immediately follow the resolution of the related criminal proceeding, shall be part of the other proceeding and shall be heard by the same trier of fact. Any objection by the defendant to the consolidation, or any motion by the defendant to sever the related criminal case from the forfeiture action, constitutes a waiver of double jeopardy as to the related criminal action and the forfeiture action. [2009 c.78 §35]

 

(Special Motion for Release of Property)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2023–2024 · leading case: Yamhill Cnty. v. Real Prop., 324 Or. App. 412 (Or. Ct. App. 2023).
Yamhill Cnty. v. Real Prop., 324 Or. App. 412 (Or. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 4× “265 and ORS 131A.270 by providing for stays and the consolidation of ORS chapter 131A forfeiture proceedings with criminal cases.”
Yamhill Cnty. v. Real Prop., 373 Or. 82 (Or. 2024). “265 and ORS 131A.270, which provide for stays or consolidation of related criminal and civil forfeiture actions and which specify that a defendant’s motion to stay a forfeiture or any opposition by the defendant to consolidation “constitutes a waiver of double jeopardy” by the…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 131A.270(2) — 1 case
Yamhill Cnty. v. Real Prop., 324 Or. App. 412 (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “265 and ORS 131A.270 by providing for stays and the consolidation of ORS chapter 131A forfeiture proceedings with criminal cases.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.