Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 132.410 (2026)

Finding of indictment; filing; inspection

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      132.410 Finding of indictment; filing; inspection. An indictment, when found and indorsed, as provided in ORS 132.400 and 132.580, shall be filed with the clerk of the court, in whose office it shall remain as a public record. Upon being designated by the district attorney as confidential and until after the arrest of a defendant who has not been held to answer the charge, the indictment or any order or process in relation thereto shall not be inspected by any person other than the judge, the clerk of the court, the district attorney or a peace officer in the discharge of a duty concerning the indictment, order or process. [Amended by 1973 c.836 §52; 1999 c.967 §2]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1959–2009 · leading case: MacEwan v. HOLM, 359 P.2d 413 (Or. 1961).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
MacEwan v. HOLM, 359 P.2d 413 (Or. 1961). · cites it 2× “Two very familiar instances are the prohibitions which prevent disclosure of income tax returns and the minutes of the grand jury (ORS 132.410). My own position here is aptly expressed by U.”
State v. Williams, 222 P.3d 31 (Or. Ct. App. 2009). “005(1), (3), (4), (9); ORS 132.410. We simply erred in citing ORS 131.”
Papadopoulos v. State Bd. of Higher Educ., 494 P.2d 260 (Or. Ct. App. 1972). “600 (conciliation service records) ORS 132.410 (grand jury indictments prior to arrest) ORS 179.”
Miller v. Gladden, 348 P.2d 44 (Or. 1959). “” Miller has presented no bill of exceptions and, therefore, we are confined to the record reviewed in preceding paragraphs, in our efforts to resolve his contentions.”
State v. Knighten, 504 P.2d 761 (Or. Ct. App. 1972). “*43 Defendant’s first assignment of error is that the trial court erred in denying his motion to set aside the indictment on the ground that there was no showing that the indictment was presented to the court in the manner prescribed by ORS 132.410. That section provides that an…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.