133.743
Definitions for ORS 133.743 to 133.857; appointment of legal counsel to assist
Governor. (1)
Where appearing in ORS 133.743 to 133.857, the term “Governor” includes any
person performing the extradition functions of Governor by authority of an
appointment under subsection (2) of this section. The term “executive authority”
includes the Governor and any person performing the functions of Governor in a
state other than this state, and the term “state,” referring to a state other
than this state, includes any other state or territory, organized or
unorganized, of the United States of America.
(2) The Governor
may appoint a member of the legal staff of the Governor to act in behalf of the
Governor under ORS 133.743 to 133.857 in performing the extradition functions
of the Governor. The appointment shall be in writing and be filed with the Secretary
of State. [Formerly 147.010; 1983 c.82 §1]
Notes of Decisions
State v. Brown (1984)
or
““(c) Proceedings for extradition, except as required by ORS 133.743 to 133.857. “(d) Sentencing, except as required by ORS 137.”
State v. Epps (1978)
orctapp · cites it 2×
“The contention is that the sole remedy available to foreign bondsmen is now under the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act (ORS 133.743 to 133.857), and particularly, with respect to arresting their principal in Oregon, under ORS 133.”
Application of Carden (1981)
or · cites it 2×
“6 Oregon’s version of the act, adopted in 1935, is presently codified in ORS 133.743 et seq. The act generally provides that, subject to the qualifications of the act and the provisions of the federal constitution and statutes, it is the duty of the Governor of Oregon to have a…”
State v. Sills (2013)
orctapp
“In 2009, the district attorney’s office pursued defendant’s return for sentencing under the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, ORS 133.743 to 133.857. In February 2010, the state requested that California return defendant to Oregon in a requisition signed by Governor Rulongoski.”
State v. Armstrong (1980)
orctapp
“They cannot include expenses inherent in providing a constitutionally guaranteed jury trial or expenditures in connection with the maintenance and operation of government agencies that must be made by the public irrespective of specific violations of law.”
State v. McCrory (2005)
orctapp · cites it 2×
“” At oral argument the state argued that a request under the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act (UCEA), ORS 133.743 to 113.857, was the only method of getting custody of defendant and because the UCEA is wholly discretionary, there was no guarantee that defendant would be…”
Zimmerman v. State (2003)
orctapp
“Petitioner was not on probation and even if he were, the post-conviction court is not the proper court to impose those types of sanctions.”
State v. Tally (2002)
orctapp · cites it 2×
“809 (providing that, when a person is arrested pursuant to the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, ORS 133.743 to 133.857, the judge or magistrate is required to “make a release decision concerning the person * * * under ORS 135.”
State v. Ayers (2006)
orctapp
“See ORS 133.743 - 133.857. On June 16, 1998, Washington authorities notified the Multnomah County Sheriffs Office that defendant had been convicted and sentenced to 109 months’ imprisonment and that she was being transferred to the state women’s correctional center in Gig…”
Thomas v. Keeney (1989)
or
“2 The Uniform Criminal Extradition Act (UCEA) is codified in Oregon as ORS 133.743 to 133.833 and 133.839 to 133.”
Woodard v. Rasmussen (1985)
orctapp · cites it 3×
“The Governor has delegated authority to sign extradition warrants to Oliver pursuant to ORS 133.743, which provides: “(1) Where appearing in ORS 133.”
Betschart v. Spinden (2001)
orctapp · cites it 2×
“Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus to prevent his extradition under the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act (UCEA), ORS 133.743 et seq., for alleged probation violations in the state of Washington.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 133.743(2) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.