Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 135.225 (2026)

Forwarding of papers by magistrate

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      135.225 Forwarding of papers by magistrate. When the magistrate has held the defendant to answer, the magistrate shall at once forward to the court in which the defendant would be triable:

      (1) The warrant, if any;

      (2) The information;

      (3) The statement of the defendant, if the defendant made one;

      (4) The memoranda mentioned in ORS 135.115 and 135.145;

      (5) The release agreement or security release of the defendant; and

      (6) If applicable, any security taken for the appearance of witnesses. [Formerly 133.860; 2005 c.22 §108]

 

RELEASE OF DEFENDANT

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1978–2020 · leading case: State v. Keys, 460 P.3d 1020 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Keys, 460 P.3d 1020 (Or. Ct. App. 2020). “185 (1977) (providing that a magis- trate who made a probable cause determination “shall make a written order holding the defendant for further proceed- ings on the charge”); ORS 135.225 (1977) (providing that, in those circumstances, the magistrate “shall at once forward to the…”
Springer v. State, 621 P.2d 1213 (Or. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 2× “" He also alleges his innocence "of the crime for which he was arrested and of any crime"; that "* * * [h]ad he been convicted of the charge of criminal mischief in the first degree, arising out of his arrest on April 13, 1979, he would meet all the conditions for having his…”
State v. King, 733 P.2d 472 (Or. Ct. App. 1987). ““2) The indictment of April 19, 1983 was returned and filed within the 30-days allowed by the Court to the State to resubmit the matter to the Grand Jury.” Defendant relies on ORS 132.”
State v. Sheppard, 581 P.2d 549 (Or. Ct. App. 1978). · cites it 2× “185 3 and ORS 135.225. 4 In the instant case, the charge contained in the information was cast in the language of ORS 164.”
State v. Beck, 295 P.3d 169 (Or. Ct. App. 2013). “1 For the reasons explained below, we conclude that ORS 135.225(7) — which provides that convictions for criminally negligent homicide as defined by ORS 163.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 135.225(7) — 1 case
State v. Beck, 295 P.3d 169 (Or. Ct. App. 2013). “1 For the reasons explained below, we conclude that ORS 135.225(7) — which provides that convictions for criminally negligent homicide as defined by ORS 163.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.