Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 137.673 (2026)

Validity of rules

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      137.673 Validity of rules. Rules adopted by the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission shall not be declared invalid solely because of irregularities in procedural rulemaking, including but not limited to the provisions of ORS 183.335 or 183.400 (4)(c). [1989 c.790 §73; 1995 c.420 §9; 2001 c.220 §2; 2005 c.382 §3]

 

      Note: See note under 137.651.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1997–1997 · leading case: State ex rel. Huddleston v. Sawyer, 932 P.2d 1145 (Or. 1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. Huddleston v. Sawyer, 932 P.2d 1145 (Or. 1997). · cites it 2× “ORS 137.673. ORS 137.669 provides that the felony sentencing guidelines adopted by the Commission and approved by the legislature "shall control the sentences for all crimes committed after the effective date of such guidelines.”
State v. Tucker, 951 P.2d 190 (Or. Ct. App. 1997). “1” ORS 137.673(2) provides: “A motion to suppress which has been denied may be renewed, in the discretion of the court, on the ground of newly discovered evidence, or as the interests of justice require.”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 137.673(2): 1 case
State v. Tucker, 951 P.2d 190 (Or. Ct. App. 1997). “1” ORS 137.673(2) provides: “A motion to suppress which has been denied may be renewed, in the discretion of the court, on the ground of newly discovered evidence, or as the interests of justice require.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.