Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 153.022 (2026)

Authority of agency to specify rule violation as particular level of violation

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      153.022 Authority of agency to specify rule violation as particular level of violation. If a statute provides that violation of the rules of an agency constitutes an offense, as described in ORS 161.505, the agency may by rule specify that violation of a specific rule of the agency is subject to a specific fine, or a specific maximum fine, that is less in amount than the maximum fine for the offense specified by the statute. In addition, the agency may specify that violation of the specific rule is a Class A, B, C or D violation under the provisions of ORS 153.012 as long as the class specified in the rule is lower than the statutory classification for the offense. [1999 c.1051 §76]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2006–2008 · leading case: State v. Couch, 147 P.3d 322 (Or. 2006).
State v. Couch, 147 P.3d 322 (Or. 2006). “992(1) provides: "Except as otherwise provided by ORS 153.022 and other law, violation of any *324 provision of the wildlife laws, or any rule promulgated pursuant thereto, is a Class A misdemeanor when the offense is committed with a culpable mental state as defined in ORS 161.”
State v. Hogevoll, 196 P.3d 1008 (Or. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “992(1) provides: "Except as otherwise provided by ORS 153.022 and other law, violation of any provision of the wildlife laws, or any rule promulgated pursuant thereto, is a Class A misdemeanor when the offense is committed with a culpable mental state as defined in ORS 161.”
State v. Couch, 147 P.3d 322 (Or. 2006). “992(1) provides: “Except as otherwise provided by ORS 153.022 and other law, violation of any provision of the wildlife laws, or any rule promulgated pursuant thereto, is a Class A misdemeanor when the offense is committed with a culpable mental state as defined in ORS 161.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.