Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 163.433 (2026)

Online sexual corruption of a child in the first degree

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      163.433 Online sexual corruption of a child in the first degree. (1) A person commits the crime of online sexual corruption of a child in the first degree if the person violates ORS 163.432 and intentionally takes a substantial step toward physically meeting with or encountering the child.

      (2) Online sexual corruption of a child in the first degree is a Class B felony. [2007 c.876 §3]

 

      Note: See note under 163.431.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases (14 in the last 5 years), 2015–2026 · leading case: State v. Street, 505 P.3d 425 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Street, 505 P.3d 425 (Or. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 9× “In his first assignment, he asserts that the trial court erred by denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on the two counts of first-degree online sexual corruption of a child.”
Daramola v. State, 430 P.3d 201 (Or. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 11× “*457 Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying his petition for post-conviction relief wherein he alleged ineffective and inadequate assistance of counsel in providing advice as to the immigration consequences of entering a guilty plea to one count of first-degree online sexual…”
State v. Lewis, 423 P.3d 129 (Or. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “*2 Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for one count of first-degree online sexual corruption of a child, ORS 163.433, contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal.”
State v. Smith, 452 P.3d 492 (Or. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “057, first-degree online sexual corruption of a child, ORS 163.433, and attempted second-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.”
State v. Hunt, 346 P.3d 1285 (Or. Ct. App. 2015). “With respect to the count of attempted use of a child in a display of sexually explicit conduct, the information alleged that defendant “did unlawfully attempt to permit [M], a child, to engage in sexually explicit *208 conduct for a person to observe [.”
State v. Wampler, 530 P.3d 133 (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “1 1 Defendant’s fourth, fifth, and sixth assignments of error assert that the trial court erred when it denied his motions for judgment of acquittal on Counts 3 and 7, luring a minor, ORS 167.”
State v. Fernandez, 555 P.3d 350 (Or. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for first-degree online sexual corruption of a child, ORS 163.433 (Count 1), challenging his presumptive sentence imposed under the felony sentencing guidelines.”
State v. Meyers, 565 P.3d 463 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “432(1) (a person commits the crime of second-degree online sexual corruption of a child if “[f]or the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sex- ual desire of the person or another person, [they] knowingly use[ ] an online com- munication to solicit a child to engage in sexual…”
State v. Meyers, 338 Or. App. 59 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “432(1) (a person commits the crime of second-degree online sexual corruption of a child if “[f]or the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sex- ual desire of the person or another person, [they] knowingly use[ ] an online com- munication to solicit a child to engage in sexual…”
State v. Fernandez, 375 Or. 205 (Or. 2026). · cites it 2× “ORS 163.433; OAR 213-017-0004(12). At sentenc- ing, the trial court calculated defendant’s sentence accord- ing to the framework specified by the guidelines.”
State v. Gale, 446 P.3d 544 (Or. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 4× “385, and two counts of first-degree online sexual corruption of a child, ORS 163.433. On appeal, defendant assigns error to the trial court's denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal (MJOA) on the two online sexual corruption charges.”
State v. Quinn-Ward, 341 Or. App. 198 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “” 1 ORS 163.433(1) provides: “A person commits the crime of online sexual corruption of a child in the first degree if the person violates ORS 163.”
Show all 20 citing cases →
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163.433(1) — 4 cases
State v. Meyers, 565 P.3d 463 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “432(1) (a person commits the crime of second-degree online sexual corruption of a child if “[f]or the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sex- ual desire of the person or another person, [they] knowingly use[ ] an online com- munication to solicit a child to engage in sexual…”
State v. Meyers, 338 Or. App. 59 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “432(1) (a person commits the crime of second-degree online sexual corruption of a child if “[f]or the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sex- ual desire of the person or another person, [they] knowingly use[ ] an online com- munication to solicit a child to engage in sexual…”
State v. Quinn-Ward, 341 Or. App. 198 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “” 1 ORS 163.433(1) provides: “A person commits the crime of online sexual corruption of a child in the first degree if the person violates ORS 163.”
State v. Quinn-Ward, 341 Or. App. 198 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163.433(2) — 2 cases
State v. Fernandez, 555 P.3d 350 (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for first-degree online sexual corruption of a child, ORS 163.433 (Count 1), challenging his presumptive sentence imposed under the felony sentencing guidelines.”
State v. Fernandez (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.