Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.125 (2026)

Relief from reporting obligation for sex offenders classified under ORS 163A.100; reclassification; procedure

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      163A.125 Relief from reporting obligation for sex offenders classified under ORS 163A.100; reclassification; procedure. (1)(a) A person who is required to report as a sex offender under ORS 163A.010, 163A.015 or 163A.020 due to a conviction for a sex crime and is classified as a level one sex offender under ORS 163A.100 (1) may petition the State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision to relieve the person from the obligation to report as a sex offender under ORS 163A.010, 163A.015 or 163A.020.

      (b) A person who is required to report as a sex offender under ORS 163A.010, 163A.015 or 163A.020 due to being found guilty except for insanity under ORS 161.295 for a sex crime, and is classified as a level one sex offender under ORS 163A.100 (1), may petition the Psychiatric Security Review Board to relieve the person from the obligation to report as a sex offender under ORS 163A.010, 163A.015 or 163A.020.

      (c)(A) Except as otherwise provided in subparagraph (B) of this paragraph, a person described in paragraph (a) or (b) of this subsection may file the petition no sooner than five years after the date supervision for the sex crime is terminated or, if the person was not subject to supervision for the sex crime, five years after the date the person was discharged from the jurisdiction of the court, Psychiatric Security Review Board or Oregon Health Authority.

      (B) A person who was reclassified under subsection (2) of this section from a level two sex offender under ORS 163A.100 (2) to a level one sex offender under ORS 163A.100 (1) may file the petition no sooner than five years after the date of reclassification.

      (d) Notwithstanding paragraph (c) of this subsection, if a person is required to report because of a conviction or finding of guilty except for insanity from another United States court as that term is defined in ORS 163A.005, the person may not petition for relief from reporting as a sex offender in Oregon unless the laws of the jurisdiction where the person was convicted or found guilty except for insanity would permit a petition for relief from reporting as a sex offender.

      (2)(a) A person who is required to report as a sex offender under ORS 163A.010, 163A.015 or 163A.020 due to a conviction for a sex crime and is classified as a level three sex offender under ORS 163A.100 (3) may petition the State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision to reclassify the person as a level two sex offender under ORS 163A.100 (2).

      (b) A person who is required to report as a sex offender under ORS 163A.010, 163A.015 or 163A.020 due to being found guilty except for insanity under ORS 161.295 for a sex crime, and is classified as a level three sex offender under ORS 163A.100 (3), may petition the Psychiatric Security Review Board to reclassify the person as a level two sex offender under ORS 163A.100 (2).

      (c) A person who is required to report as a sex offender under ORS 163A.010, 163A.015 or 163A.020 due to a conviction for a sex crime and is classified as a level two sex offender under ORS 163A.100 (2) may petition the State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision to reclassify the person as a level one sex offender under ORS 163A.100 (1).

      (d) A person who is required to report as a sex offender under ORS 163A.010, 163A.015 or 163A.020 due to being found guilty except for insanity under ORS 161.295 for a sex crime, and is classified as a level two sex offender under ORS 163A.100 (2), may petition the Psychiatric Security Review Board to reclassify the person as a level one sex offender under ORS 163A.100 (1).

      (e) The petition described in this subsection may be filed no sooner than 10 years after the date supervision for the sex crime is terminated or, if the person was not subject to supervision for the sex crime, 10 years after the date the person was discharged from the jurisdiction of the court, Psychiatric Security Review Board or Oregon Health Authority.

      (3)(a) The State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision or the Psychiatric Security Review Board shall deny a petition filed under this section if, at any time after the person is convicted or found guilty except for insanity of a sex crime, the person is convicted of or found guilty except for insanity of a person felony or a person Class A misdemeanor, as those terms are defined in the rules of the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission.

      (b) The appropriate board shall deny a petition filed under subsection (2)(c) or (d) of this section if the board has previously reclassified the person as a level two sex offender under ORS 163A.100 (2) as the result of a petition filed under subsection (2)(a) or (b) of this section.

      (4)(a) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (3) of this section, if a person files a petition under subsection (1) of this section, the State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision or the Psychiatric Security Review Board shall hold a hearing. At the hearing, the board shall enter an order relieving the person of the obligation to report as a sex offender under ORS 163A.010, 163A.015 or 163A.020 if the board determines, by clear and convincing evidence, that the person:

      (A) Is statistically unlikely to reoffend; and

      (B) Does not pose a threat to the safety of the public.

      (b)(A) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (3) of this section, if a person files a petition under subsection (2)(a) or (b) of this section, the State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision or the Psychiatric Security Review Board shall hold a hearing. At the hearing, the board shall enter an order reclassifying the person as a level two sex offender under ORS 163A.100 (2) if, after completion of a new risk assessment utilizing the risk assessment methodology described in ORS 163A.100, the person is classified as presenting a low or moderate risk of reoffending and the board determines that a lower level of notification is sufficient to protect public safety.

      (B) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (3) of this section, if a person files a petition under subsection (2)(c) or (d) of this section, the State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision or the Psychiatric Security Review Board shall hold a hearing. At the hearing, the board shall enter an order reclassifying the person as a level one sex offender under ORS 163A.100 (1) if, after completion of a new risk assessment utilizing the risk assessment methodology described in ORS 163A.100, the person is classified as presenting a low risk of reoffending and the board determines that a lower level of notification is sufficient to protect public safety.

      (5) In making the determinations described in subsection (4) of this section, the State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision or the Psychiatric Security Review Board shall consider:

      (a) The nature of and degree of violence involved in the offense that requires reporting;

      (b) The age and number of victims of the offense that requires reporting;

      (c) The age of the person at the time of the offense that requires reporting;

      (d) The length of time since the offense that requires reporting and the time period during which the person has not reoffended;

      (e) The person’s performance on supervision for the offense that requires reporting;

      (f) Whether the person has participated in or successfully completed a court-approved sex offender treatment program or any other rehabilitative programs;

      (g) The person’s stability in employment and housing;

      (h) The person’s community and personal support system;

      (i) Other criminal and relevant noncriminal behavior of the person both before and after the offense that requires reporting; and

      (j) Any other relevant factors.

      (6)(a) The Attorney General may represent the state at a hearing conducted under this section unless the district attorney of the county in which the person was convicted or, if the conviction for which the person is required to report as a sex offender was entered in another United States court, the district attorney of the county in which the person resides, elects to represent the state.

      (b) If a district attorney elects to represent the state, the district attorney shall give timely written notice of the election to the Attorney General, the State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision or the Psychiatric Security Review Board and the person who is the subject of the hearing.

      (c) If the district attorney declines to represent the state, the district attorney shall cooperate with the Attorney General in securing the material necessary to represent the state.

      (7)(a) When the State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision or the Psychiatric Security Review Board enters an order under this section relieving a person of the obligation to report as a sex offender under ORS 163A.010, 163A.015 or 163A.020 or enters an order reclassifying a person as a level two sex offender under ORS 163A.100 (2) or as a level one sex offender under ORS 163A.100 (1), the board shall forward a copy of the order to the Department of State Police.

      (b) Upon receipt of an order relieving a person of the obligation to report, the department shall remove from the Law Enforcement Data System the sex offender information obtained from the sex offender registration form submitted under ORS 163A.010, 163A.015 or 163A.020.

      (c) Upon receipt of an order reclassifying a person as a level two sex offender under ORS 163A.100 (2) or as a level one sex offender under ORS 163A.100 (1), the department shall update the Law Enforcement Data System to reflect the reclassification.

      (8) The State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision and the Psychiatric Security Review Board shall adopt rules to carry out the provisions of this section. The rules may include a filing fee in an amount determined by the appropriate board. All fees paid under this subsection shall be deposited into the General Fund and credited to the account of the appropriate board.

      (9) As used in this section, “supervision” means probation, parole, post-prison supervision or any other form of supervised or conditional release. [Formerly 181.821]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (9 in the last 5 years), 2022–2025 · leading case: Bourn v. Bd. of Parole, 338 Or. App. 196 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
Bourn v. Bd. of Parole, 338 Or. App. 196 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 4× “In 2021, more than five years after petitioner completed his supervised release, he petitioned the board for relief or reclassification from sex offender registration as provided in ORS 163A.125. At that time, petitioner was living in California.”
Bourn v. Bd. of Parole, 338 Or. App. 196 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 4× “In 2021, more than five years after petitioner completed his supervised release, he petitioned the board for relief or reclassification from sex offender registration as provided in ORS 163A.125. At that time, petitioner was living in California.”
Watson v. Bd. of Parole (Or. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 3× “That argument turns on the inclusion of several specific provi- sions in the 2013 legislation that created the three-tiered sex- offender registry: that registrants must wait until 10 years after release from supervision to request reclassification, ORS 163A.125(2)(e); that…”
Sohappy v. Bd. of Parole (Or. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 3× “See ORS 163A.125(1) (allowing people classified in Level 1 to request relief from the sex offender registration requirement).”
Thomsen v. Bd. of Parole (Or. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 3× “125(3)(b) (limits on reclas- sification); ORS 163A.125(1)(a) (only a Level I sex offender may petition for relief from reporting).”
Thomsen v. Bd. of Parole (Or. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 3× “125(3)(b) (limits on reclas- sification); ORS 163A.125(1)(a) (only a Level I sex offender may petition for relief from reporting).”
Haverly v. Bd. of Parole, 335 Or. App. 414 (Or. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 3× “Board of Parole pursuant to ORS 163A.125(1)(a) and (c).2 Because the frame- work under which petitioner was initially classified has been deemed invalid, and petitioner may be entitled to immediate relief from reporting, we conclude that the interests of jus- tice require…”
Allen v. Bd. of Parole (Or. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “See ORS 163A.125(2)(c), 163A.125(1)(a) (so provid- ing as to Level 2 and 1 offenders).”
Lee v. Bd. of Parole, 323 Or. App. 471 (Or. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (the board) denying his petition, pursuant to ORS 163A.125(1), for relief from sex offender registration.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.125(1) — 2 cases
Lee v. Bd. of Parole, 323 Or. App. 471 (Or. Ct. App. 2022). “Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (the board) denying his petition, pursuant to ORS 163A.125(1), for relief from sex offender registration.”
Sohappy v. Bd. of Parole (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “See ORS 163A.125(1) (allowing people classified in Level 1 to request relief from the sex offender registration requirement).”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.125(1)(a) — 6 cases
Bourn v. Bd. of Parole, 338 Or. App. 196 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “In 2021, more than five years after petitioner completed his supervised release, he petitioned the board for relief or reclassification from sex offender registration as provided in ORS 163A.125. At that time, petitioner was living in California.”
Bourn v. Bd. of Parole, 338 Or. App. 196 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “In 2021, more than five years after petitioner completed his supervised release, he petitioned the board for relief or reclassification from sex offender registration as provided in ORS 163A.125. At that time, petitioner was living in California.”
Sohappy v. Bd. of Parole (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “See ORS 163A.125(1) (allowing people classified in Level 1 to request relief from the sex offender registration requirement).”
Thomsen v. Bd. of Parole (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “125(3)(b) (limits on reclas- sification); ORS 163A.125(1)(a) (only a Level I sex offender may petition for relief from reporting).”
Thomsen v. Bd. of Parole (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “125(3)(b) (limits on reclas- sification); ORS 163A.125(1)(a) (only a Level I sex offender may petition for relief from reporting).”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.125(1)(c)(B) — 1 case
Haverly v. Bd. of Parole, 335 Or. App. 414 (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “Board of Parole pursuant to ORS 163A.125(1)(a) and (c).2 Because the frame- work under which petitioner was initially classified has been deemed invalid, and petitioner may be entitled to immediate relief from reporting, we conclude that the interests of jus- tice require…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.125(2)(c) — 2 cases
Allen v. Bd. of Parole (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “See ORS 163A.125(2)(c), 163A.125(1)(a) (so provid- ing as to Level 2 and 1 offenders).”
Haverly v. Bd. of Parole, 335 Or. App. 414 (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “Board of Parole pursuant to ORS 163A.125(1)(a) and (c).2 Because the frame- work under which petitioner was initially classified has been deemed invalid, and petitioner may be entitled to immediate relief from reporting, we conclude that the interests of jus- tice require…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.125(2)(e) — 1 case
Watson v. Bd. of Parole (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “That argument turns on the inclusion of several specific provi- sions in the 2013 legislation that created the three-tiered sex- offender registry: that registrants must wait until 10 years after release from supervision to request reclassification, ORS 163A.125(2)(e); that…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.125(3) — 1 case
Allen v. Bd. of Parole (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “See ORS 163A.125(2)(c), 163A.125(1)(a) (so provid- ing as to Level 2 and 1 offenders).”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.125(3)(a) — 1 case
Watson v. Bd. of Parole (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “That argument turns on the inclusion of several specific provi- sions in the 2013 legislation that created the three-tiered sex- offender registry: that registrants must wait until 10 years after release from supervision to request reclassification, ORS 163A.125(2)(e); that…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.125(3)(b) — 3 cases
Watson v. Bd. of Parole (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “That argument turns on the inclusion of several specific provi- sions in the 2013 legislation that created the three-tiered sex- offender registry: that registrants must wait until 10 years after release from supervision to request reclassification, ORS 163A.125(2)(e); that…”
Thomsen v. Bd. of Parole (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “125(3)(b) (limits on reclas- sification); ORS 163A.125(1)(a) (only a Level I sex offender may petition for relief from reporting).”
Thomsen v. Bd. of Parole (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “125(3)(b) (limits on reclas- sification); ORS 163A.125(1)(a) (only a Level I sex offender may petition for relief from reporting).”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.125(4)(a) — 1 case
Sohappy v. Bd. of Parole (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “See ORS 163A.125(1) (allowing people classified in Level 1 to request relief from the sex offender registration requirement).”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 163A.125(5) — 2 cases
Thomsen v. Bd. of Parole (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “125(3)(b) (limits on reclas- sification); ORS 163A.125(1)(a) (only a Level I sex offender may petition for relief from reporting).”
Thomsen v. Bd. of Parole (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “125(3)(b) (limits on reclas- sification); ORS 163A.125(1)(a) (only a Level I sex offender may petition for relief from reporting).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.