Oregon Revised Statutes
Or. Rev. Stat. § 164.875 (2026)
Unlawful videotape recording
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ORSoregonlegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
164.875 Unlawful videotape recording. (1) A person commits the crime of unlawful videotape recording if the person:
(a) Produces for sale any videotape without the written consent of the owner of the motion picture imprinted thereon; or
(b) Knowingly sells or offers for sale any videotape that has been produced without the written consent of the owner of the motion picture imprinted thereon.
(2) Unlawful videotape recording is a Class B misdemeanor. [1979 c.550 §2; 1993 c.95 §4]
164.876 [1993 c.95 §12; repealed by 2001 c.666 §56]
164.877 [1989 c.1003 §§2,3; renumbered 164.886 in 2007]
164.879 [2001 c.666 §50; repealed by 2005 c.830 §48]
164.880 [Repealed by 1971 c.743 §432]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 1980–1980 · leading case: Mignot v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 613 P.2d 86 (Or. Ct. App. 1980).
Mignot v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 613 P.2d 86 (Or. Ct. App. 1980). “While it may be true that placing of the tires on the property constitutes violation of some other law or regulation of the DEQ there is no violation of ORS 164.875(2) shown by this evidence. The order of the Department of Environmental Quality is reversed.”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 164.875(2): 1 case
Mignot v. Dep't of Env't Quality, 613 P.2d 86 (Or. Ct. App. 1980). “While it may be true that placing of the tires on the property constitutes violation of some other law or regulation of the DEQ there is no violation of ORS 164.875(2) shown by this evidence. The order of the Department of Environmental Quality is reversed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.