Oregon Revised Statutes
Or. Rev. Stat. § 174.550 (2026)
Statute revision of 1953 substituted for statutes repealed by ORS 174.520
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ORSoregonlegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
174.550 Statute revision of 1953 substituted for statutes repealed by ORS 174.520. The provisions of the statute laws described in ORS 174.510 (1) are considered as substituted in a continuing way for the provisions of the prior statute laws repealed by ORS 174.520. [1953 c.3 §5; 1961 c.90 §6]
174.560 [1953 c.3 §8; repealed by 1961 c.90 §7]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1954–2021 · leading case: Hughes v. State of Oregon, 838 P.2d 1018 (Or. 1992).
Hughes v. State of Oregon, 838 P.2d 1018 (Or. 1992). “Or.Laws 1953, ch. 3. At that time, OCLA 90-723 was repealed and reenacted as former ORS 237.”
Hernandez v. Catholic Health Initiatives, 490 P.3d 166 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). “ORS 174.550; see ORS 174.510(1) (describing 1953 revision); ORS 174.”
Nibler v. Oregon Dep't of Transp., 105 P.3d 360 (Or. 2005). “See ORS 174.550 (so providing). The foregoing contextual review, standing alone, strongly suggests that the legislature intended ORS 14.”
Matter of Marriage of Crocker, 971 P.2d 469 (Or. Ct. App. 1998). “ORS 174.550.” Hughes v. State of Oregon, 314 Or 1 , 7 n 7, 838 P2d 1018 (1992) (emphasis omitted).”
State of Oregon v. Holland, 277 P.2d 386 (Or. 1954). “” ORS 174.550. (Emphasis ours.) It is clear, as contended by the defendant, that Oregon Revised Statutes were adopted as laws, and not merely as evidence of the law.”
State v. McCathern, 154 P.3d 130 (Or. Ct. App. 2007). “” ORS 174.550 makes clear that the general repeal and reenactment of statutes in 1953 did not result in any substantive changes to the law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.