Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 180.750 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      180.750 Definitions. As used in ORS 180.750 to 180.785:

      (1) “Claim” means a request or demand made to a public agency, including a request or demand made pursuant to a contract, that seeks moneys, property, services or benefits that will be provided in whole or in part by a public body, whether directly or through reimbursement of another public agency that provides the moneys, property, services or benefits.

      (2) “False claim” means a claim that:

      (a) Contains, or is based on, false or fraudulent information;

      (b) Contains any statement or representation that is untrue in whole or part; or

      (c) Omits information that could have a material effect on the value, validity or authenticity of the claim.

      (3) “Public agency” means:

      (a) A public body;

      (b) The United States or a federal agency;

      (c) A person who contracts with a public body; or

      (d) A person other than an individual who receives a grant from a public body.

      (4) “Public body” has the meaning given that term in ORS 174.109. [2009 c.292 §1]

 

      Note: 180.750 to 180.785 were enacted into law by the Legislative Assembly but were not added to or made a part of ORS chapter 180 or any series therein by legislative action. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2012–2015 · leading case: Neighorn v. Quest Health Care, 870 F. Supp. 2d 1069 (D. Or. 2012).
Neighorn v. Quest Health Care, 870 F. Supp. 2d 1069 (D. Or. 2012). · cites it 2× “2009) (codified at Or.Rev. Stat. § 180.750, et seq.). (Am. Compl.”
Oracle Am., Inc. v. Oregon Health Ins. Exch. Corp., 80 F. Supp. 3d 1168 (D. Or. 2015). “On August 22, 2014, Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum, the State of Oregon, and Cover Oregon filed an action in Marion County Circuit Court (the State Action) against Oracle, Mythics, and six Oracle employees 2 alleging claims for fraud; breach of contract; breach of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.