Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 192.695 (2026)

Prima facie evidence of violation required of plaintiff

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      192.695 Prima facie evidence of violation required of plaintiff. In any suit commenced under ORS 192.680 (2), the plaintiff shall be required to present prima facie evidence of a violation of ORS 192.610 to 192.705 before the governing body shall be required to prove that its acts in deliberating toward a decision complied with the law. When a plaintiff presents prima facie evidence of a violation of the open meetings law, the burden to prove that the provisions of ORS 192.610 to 192.705 were complied with shall be on the governing body. [1981 c.892 §97d; 1989 c.544 §3]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1989–2018 · leading case: Handy v. Lane Cnty., 362 P.3d 867 (Or. Ct. App. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Handy v. Lane Cnty., 362 P.3d 867 (Or. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “As for public meeting standards, the Oregon legislature had already added a provision at ORS 192.695 so as to require a plaintiff to present prima facie evidence of a public meetings violation before the public body will be required to prove that it complied.”
Tri-Cnty. Metro. Transp. Dist. of Or. (Trimet) v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 757, 412 P.3d 162 (Or. 2018). “Plaintiff, Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District (TriMet), brought this action for declaratory relief, seeking a declaration that planned, future collective bargaining sessions between TriMet's bargaining team and the bargaining team for defendant Amalgamated Transit…”
Harris v. Nordquist, 771 P.2d 637 (Or. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “ORS 192.695 provides: “In any suit commenced under ORS 192.”
Oregon Ass'n of Classified Employees v. Salem-Keizer Sch. Dist. 24J, 767 P.2d 1365 (Or. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “610 to ORS 192.695, and they ask that the decision be voided or that other equitable relief be given.”
Oregonian Publ'g Co. v. Oregon State Bd. of Parole, 769 P.2d 795 (Or. Ct. App. 1989). “Defendant also relies on ORS 192.695: “In any suit commenced under ORS 192.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.