Oregon Revised Statutes
Or. Rev. Stat. § 240.563 (2026)
Judicial review
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ORSoregonlegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
240.563 Judicial review. Judicial review of orders under ORS 240.560 shall be as provided in ORS chapter 183. [1971 c.734 §31]
240.565 [Amended by 1969 c.80 §79; repealed by 1979 c.468 §1]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1976–1986 · leading case: Tupper v. Fairview Hosp. & Train. Ctr., Etc., 556 P.2d 1340 (Or. 1976).
Tupper v. Fairview Hosp. & Train. Ctr., Etc., 556 P.2d 1340 (Or. 1976). “Moreover, ORS 240.563 and 183.482 specifically authorize the reviewing court to reverse or remand the agency's order if it finds "[t]he statute, rule or order to be unconstitutional.”
Shepherd v. Oregon Liquor Control Comm'n, 724 P.2d 901 (Or. Ct. App. 1986). “OLCC seeks review of the remand order pursuant to ORS 240.563. 3 At the outset, OLCC contends that there is no statutory basis authorizing ERB to consider the restoration issue or, if there is, that there is sufficient evidence in the record to support a determination affirming…”
Hensley v. State Court Sys. Appeals Bd., 695 P.2d 65 (Or. Ct. App. 1985). “560 provides for a hearing conducted by the Employment Relations Board as in a contested case under the APA; ORS 240.563 provides for judicial review of orders issued pursuant to ORS 240.”
Ashman v. Child.'s Servs. Div., 588 P.2d 665 (Or. Ct. App. 1978). “Petitioner seeks judicial review of that order under ORS 240.563. 5 Petitioner makes several assignments of error directed in part at the constitutional adequacy of the predismissal hearing and in part at the lack of substantial evidence to support the ERB’s findings that the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.