Or. Rev. Stat. § 241.002

Creating or changing county civil service by election; definitions

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

241.002 Creating or changing county civil service by election; definitions. (1) If the majority of electors of any county voting at a regular general election pursuant to ORS 241.006 approve a proposal to establish, substitute or amend a system of civil service under which county employees shall be employed, the system or amendments to an existing system of civil service approved by the electors shall apply to such county.

(2) If ORS 241.016 to 241.990 become applicable in a county, “board of county commissioners” as used in ORS 241.016 to 241.990 means the county court of a county which does not have a board of county commissioners.

(3) If ORS 242.702 to 242.824 become applicable in a county, “governing body” as used in ORS 242.702 to 242.824 means the board of county commissioners or county court of a county, as the case may be. [1959 c.315 §2]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1961–1984 · leading case: AFSCME Council 75, Local 350 v. Clackamas County

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

AFSCME Council 75, Local 350 v. Clackamas County (1984) orctapp · cites it 5× “ORS 241.002 to 241.009 provide that a county may adopt or amend a civil service system by submission to the county voters, including by initiative or referendum.”

CROFT v. Lambert (1961) or “ORS 241.002 to 241.990. The civil service law contains many sections, none of which expressly deals with the subject of ORS 204.”

Wied v. Marion County (1975) orctapp “However, ORS 241.002 to 241.008 authorize procedures whereby the Act following its adoption by the county voters may become effective in a county so enacting it.”

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 241.002(1) — 1 case

AFSCME Council 75, Local 350 v. Clackamas County (1984) orctapp “ORS 241.002 to 241.009 provide that a county may adopt or amend a civil service system by submission to the county voters, including by initiative or referendum.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.