Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 246.150 (2026)

Rules

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      246.150 Rules. The Secretary of State may adopt rules the secretary considers necessary to facilitate and assist in achieving and maintaining a maximum degree of correctness, impartiality and efficiency in administration of the election laws. [1957 c.608 §8; 1979 c.190 §8; 1985 c.448 §1]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1984–2023 · leading case: Wasson v. Fagan, 538 P.3d 911 (Or. Ct. App. 2023).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wasson v. Fagan, 538 P.3d 911 (Or. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 3× “Petitioner first asserts a violation of ORS 246.150,1 the stat- ute authorizing the Secretary to enact election rules, and second, he contends that the Secretary exceeded her statu- tory authority because the signature requirement distinc- tion violates the Oregon Constitution.”
State ex rel Sajo v. Paulus, 688 P.2d 367 (Or. 1984). “” 6 In addition, under ORS 246.150, the Secretary of State “may adopt rules the secretary considers necessary to facilitate and assist in achieving and naintaining a maximum degree of correctness, impartiality md efficiency in administration of the election laws * * Pursuant to…”
United Tel. Employees Pac v. Sec'y of State, 906 P.2d 306 (Or. Ct. App. 1995). “” ORS 246.150. Implicit in that language is the legislature’s intent that PACs and their treasurers make accurate and timely reports of their financial activities.”
Kucera v. Bradbury, 97 P.3d 1191 (Or. 2004). “” The legislature also has enacted ORS 246.150, which provides: “The Secretary of State may adopt rules the secretary considers necessary to facilitate and assist in achieving and maintaining a maximum degree of correctness, impartiality and efficiency in administration of the…”
Wasson v. Fagan (Or. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 3× “Petitioner first asserts a violation of ORS 246.150,1 the stat- ute authorizing the Secretary to enact election rules, and second, he contends that the Secretary exceeded her statu- tory authority because the signature requirement distinc- tion violates the Oregon Constitution.”
State Ex Rel. Sajo v. Paulus, 688 P.2d 367 (Or. 1984). “" [6] In addition, under ORS 246.150, the Secretary of State "may adopt rules the secretary considers necessary to facilitate and assist in achieving and maintaining a maximum degree of correctness, impartiality and efficiency in administration of the election laws * * *.”
Unger v. Rosenblum (Or. 2017). “110 and ORS 246.150. It also more specifically authorized the secretary to adopt rules neces- sary to carry out specific provisions of ORS chapter 250.”
Unger v. Rosenblum (Or. 2017). “110 and ORS 246.150. It also more specifically authorized the secretary to adopt rules neces- sary to carry out specific provisions of ORS chapter 250.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.