Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 250.255 (2026)

Application of ORS 250.265 to 250.346

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      250.255 Application of ORS 250.265 to 250.346. ORS 250.265 to 250.346 apply to the exercise of initiative or referendum powers regarding a city measure under section 1, Article IV, Oregon Constitution, unless the city charter or ordinance provides otherwise. [1979 c.190 §162]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1993–2020 · leading case: Strunk v. Pub. Employees Ret. Bd., 108 P.3d 1058 (Or. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Strunk v. Pub. Employees Ret. Bd., 108 P.3d 1058 (Or. 2005). · cites it 2× “" Moreover, for Tier One members, petitioners assert that the legislature has assured them since 1975 — the year that the predecessor statute to ORS 250.255 (2001) was enacted — that "the earnings to be credited annually to their account will be no less than the then-existing…”
City of Damascus v. State of Oregon, 472 P.3d 741 (Or. 2020). ““(3) Notwithstanding subsection (2) of this section, if ORS 250.255 makes ORS 250.265 to 250.346 inapplicable to a city, the requirements for preparing, circulating and filing a petition under this section shall be as pro- vided for an initiative petition under the city charter…”
De Young v. Brown, 443 P.3d 642 (Or. Ct. App. 2019). “"(3) Notwithstanding subsection (2) of this section, if ORS 250.255 makes ORS 250.265 to 250.346 inapplicable to a city, the requirements for preparing, circulating and filing a petition under this section shall be as provided for an initiative petition under the city charter or…”
Coultas v. City of Sutherlin, 871 P.2d 465 (Or. 1994). “ORS 250.255 provides: “ORS 250.265 to 250.”
Kelley v. City of Gresham, 870 P.2d 845 (Or. Ct. App. 1993). “ORS 250.255 provides: “ORS 250.265 to 250.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.