Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 342.553 (2026)

Discipline for resigning without providing required notice

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      342.553 Discipline for resigning without providing required notice. (1) Upon notice from a district school board of the resignation of a person who is licensed by or registered with the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission, the commission may discipline the person if the person entered into a written contract to work in a public school and resigned the position without first providing 60 days’ written notice, or the notice required in the applicable collective bargaining agreement, to the district superintendent or the school board.

      (2) In disciplining a person as provided under this section, the commission shall follow the procedure set forth in ORS 342.175 (4), 342.176 and 342.177. [Formerly 342.645; 1975 c.258 §1; 2009 c.706 §1]

 

      342.555 [Repealed by 1965 c.100 §456]

 

      342.560 [Amended by 1955 c.618 §1; 1965 c.100 §384; renumbered 342.975]

 

      342.565 [Repealed by 1965 c.100 §456]

 

      342.570 [Repealed by 1965 c.100 §456]

 

      342.575 [Amended by 1955 c.618 §2; 1965 c.100 §385; renumbered 342.980]

 

      342.580 [Repealed by 1965 c.100 §456]

 

      342.585 [Repealed by 1965 c.100 §456]

 

      342.590 [Repealed by 1963 c.544 §52]

 

      342.595 [Amended by 1953 c.392 §2; 1961 c.357 §1; 1963 c.211 §1; 1965 c.100 §375; 1975 c.431 §1; repealed by 1977 c.860 §5]

 

      342.596 [1957 c.457 §1; 1963 c.122 §1; 1965 c.100 §376; 1965 c.183 §1; 1977 c.860 §3; 1991 c.599 §1; renumbered 332.507 in 1993]

 

      342.598 [1965 c.254 §1; renumbered 332.432 in 1993]

 

      342.599 [1977 c.826 §3; repealed by 1993 c.45 §180]

 

      342.600 [Amended by 1955 c.101 §2; 1961 c.439 §12; 1963 c.544 §50a; 1965 c.100 §378; 1965 c.216 §1; repealed by 1967 c.67 §13 (342.601 enacted in lieu of 342.600)]

 

      342.601 [1967 c.67 §14 (enacted in lieu of 342.600); 1975 c.278 §8; 1975 c. 770 §48a; 1981 c.128 §1 repealed by 1983 c.187 §1]

 

      342.602 [Formerly 342.065; 1965 c.100 §379; repealed by 1973 c.458 §3]

 

      342.603 [2007 c.309 §1; renumbered 342.549 in 2009]

 

      342.604 [1971 c.519 §2; 1989 c.491 § 28; renumbered 332.534 in 1993]

 

      342.605 [Repealed by 1965 c.100 §456]

 

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT OF SCHOOL PERSONNEL

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1982–1985 · leading case: Pierce v. Douglas Sch. Dist. No. 4, 686 P.2d 332 (Or. 1984).
Pierce v. Douglas Sch. Dist. No. 4, 686 P.2d 332 (Or. 1984). · cites it 16× “” “It has been the district’s policy to hold resigning teachers to the sixty day notice required by ORS 342.553 unless a satisfactory replacement can be employed.”
Pierce v. Douglas Sch. Dist. No. 4, 653 P.2d 243 (Or. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 6× “See ORS 342.553, infra. The principal immediately forwarded her resignation notice to the District’s superintendent.”
Siler v. Turnbull, 693 P.2d 1323 (Or. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 4× “Rather, he urges that his right somehow arises out of ORS 342.553, 1 which allows a teacher to resign without penalty if he provides the school district with a 60-day notice.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 342.553(1) — 3 cases
Pierce v. Douglas Sch. Dist. No. 4, 686 P.2d 332 (Or. 1984). “” “It has been the district’s policy to hold resigning teachers to the sixty day notice required by ORS 342.553 unless a satisfactory replacement can be employed.”
Pierce v. Douglas Sch. Dist. No. 4, 653 P.2d 243 (Or. Ct. App. 1982). “See ORS 342.553, infra. The principal immediately forwarded her resignation notice to the District’s superintendent.”
Siler v. Turnbull, 693 P.2d 1323 (Or. Ct. App. 1985). “Rather, he urges that his right somehow arises out of ORS 342.553, 1 which allows a teacher to resign without penalty if he provides the school district with a 60-day notice.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.