Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 342.910 (2026)

Waiver of contract grievance claim if appeal of dismissal decision filed; waiver of certain rights and procedures

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      342.910 Waiver of contract grievance claim if appeal of dismissal decision filed; waiver of certain rights and procedures. (1) Any teacher who files an appeal of a dismissal or nonextension of a contract decision with the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board, upon motion of the school district, shall be required to waive any contract grievance claim regarding the same dismissal or nonextension of a contract as a condition to Fair Dismissal Appeals Board or subsequent judicial review.

      (2) A school district and an exclusive bargaining representative of teachers may agree to waive all or any part of the rights and procedures provided under ORS 342.805 to 342.937 if third party review of any dismissal or nonextension of a contract teacher is available. [1995 c.286 §16; 1997 c.864 §14]

 

      342.915 [1965 c.608 §13; 1971 c.570 §9; 1979 c.668 §5; repealed by 1997 c.864 §29]

 

      342.925 [1965 c.608 §14; repealed by 1971 c.570 §15]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2000–2000 · leading case: Lane Unified Bargaining Council/SLEA/OEA/NEA v. SOUTH LANE SCH. DIST. 45J3, 9 P.3d 130 (Or. Ct. App. 2000).
Lane Unified Bargaining Council/SLEA/OEA/NEA v. SOUTH LANE SCH. DIST. 45J3, 9 P.3d 130 (Or. Ct. App. 2000). “ORS 342.910(2) provides that: “A school district and an exclusive bargaining representative of teachers may agree to waive all or any part of the rights and procedures provided under ORS 342.”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 342.910(2): 1 case
Lane Unified Bargaining Council/SLEA/OEA/NEA v. SOUTH LANE SCH. DIST. 45J3, 9 P.3d 130 (Or. Ct. App. 2000). “ORS 342.910(2) provides that: “A school district and an exclusive bargaining representative of teachers may agree to waive all or any part of the rights and procedures provided under ORS 342.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.