Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 368.106 (2026)

Records and survey of property acquired for road

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      368.106 Records and survey of property acquired for road. If a county governing body acquires an interest in real property for public road purposes, the county governing body shall cause:

      (1) Any order or resolution enacted and deed or other document establishing an interest in the property for public road purposes to be recorded;

      (2) The road right of way to be surveyed and monumented;

      (3) The survey to be prepared in compliance with ORS 209.250; and

      (4) The survey to be recorded with the county surveyor. [1981 c.153 §16]

 

      368.110 [Amended by 1973 c.518 §1; repealed by 1981 c.153 §79]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2008–2009 · leading case: Shotgun Creek Ranch, LLC v. Crook Cnty., 182 P.3d 312 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Shotgun Creek Ranch, LLC v. Crook Cnty., 182 P.3d 312 (Or. Ct. App. 2008). “216(1), (2); see also ORS 368.106(1). That order establishes that the road “exists as shown on the order legalizing” it.”
Strome v. Lane Cnty., 183 P.3d 237 (Or. Ct. App. 2008). “216(1), (2); see also ORS 368.106(1). That order establishes that the road ‘exists as shown on the order legalizing’ it.”
Strome v. Lane Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 213 P.3d 1269 (Or. Ct. App. 2009). “216(1), (2); see also ORS 368.106(1). That order establishes that the road ‘exists as shown on the order legalizing’ it.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 368.106(1) — 3 cases
Shotgun Creek Ranch, LLC v. Crook Cnty., 182 P.3d 312 (Or. Ct. App. 2008). “216(1), (2); see also ORS 368.106(1). That order establishes that the road “exists as shown on the order legalizing” it.”
Strome v. Lane Cnty., 183 P.3d 237 (Or. Ct. App. 2008). “216(1), (2); see also ORS 368.106(1). That order establishes that the road ‘exists as shown on the order legalizing’ it.”
Strome v. Lane Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 213 P.3d 1269 (Or. Ct. App. 2009). “216(1), (2); see also ORS 368.106(1). That order establishes that the road ‘exists as shown on the order legalizing’ it.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.