475.125
Registration requirements.
(1) Every person who manufactures, delivers or dispenses any controlled
substance within this state or who proposes to engage in the manufacture,
delivery or dispensing of any controlled substance within this state, must
obtain annually a registration issued by the State Board of Pharmacy in
accordance with its rules.
(2) Persons
registered by the board under ORS 475.005 to 475.285 and 475.752 to 475.980 to
manufacture, deliver, dispense or conduct research with controlled substances
may possess, manufacture, deliver, dispense or conduct research with those
substances to the extent authorized by their registration and in conformity
with the other provisions of ORS 475.095 and 475.125 to 475.185 and other
applicable laws of this state.
(3) The following
persons need not register and may lawfully possess controlled substances under
ORS 475.005 to 475.285 and 475.752 to 475.980:
(a) An agent or
employee of any registered manufacturer, distributor or dispenser of any
controlled substance if the agent or employee is acting in the usual course of
business or employment.
(b) A common or
contract carrier or warehouseman, or an employee thereof, whose possession of
any controlled substance is in the usual course of business or employment.
(c) An ultimate
user or a person in possession of any controlled substance pursuant to a lawful
order of a practitioner or in lawful possession of a Schedule V substance,
unless otherwise prohibited.
(d) A
practitioner otherwise licensed under the laws of this state and authorized to
dispense or administer a controlled substance by the licensing authority.
(4) The board may
waive by rule the requirement for registration of certain manufacturers or
dispensers if it finds it consistent with the public health and safety.
(5) A separate
registration is required at each principal place of business or professional
practice where the applicant manufactures, delivers or dispenses controlled
substances.
(6) The board may
inspect the establishment of a registrant or applicant for registration in
accordance with the rules of the board. [1977 c.745 §8; 1995 c.440 §24; 2011
c.524 §23]
475.130 [Repealed by 1957 c.587 §12]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
3
cases, 1990–2008 · leading case:
State v. Fries, 158 P.3d 10 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).
State v. Fries, 158 P.3d 10 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 8× “ORS 475.125 provides exemptions from criminal liability for the possession of a controlled substance in ORS 475.”
State v. Fries, 185 P.3d 453 (Or. 2008).
· cites it 3× “” ORS 475.125(3)(a). If defendant were correct that “possess” does not include persons who handle or transport controlled substances at another’s direction, then there would have been no need for the legislature to provide that common carriers or agents lawfully may possess…”
State v. Venet, 797 P.2d 1055 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).
· cites it 4× “125: "(3) The following persons need not register and may lawfully possess controlled substances * * *: "* * * * * "(c) An ultimate user or a person in possession of any controlled substance pursuant to a lawful order of a practitioner or in lawful possession of a Schedule V…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 475.125(3) — 1 case
State v. Venet, 797 P.2d 1055 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).
“125: "(3) The following persons need not register and may lawfully possess controlled substances * * *: "* * * * * "(c) An ultimate user or a person in possession of any controlled substance pursuant to a lawful order of a practitioner or in lawful possession of a Schedule V…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 475.125(3)(a) — 1 case
State v. Fries, 185 P.3d 453 (Or. 2008).
“” ORS 475.125(3)(a). If defendant were correct that “possess” does not include persons who handle or transport controlled substances at another’s direction, then there would have been no need for the legislature to provide that common carriers or agents lawfully may possess…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 475.125(3)(b) — 1 case
State v. Fries, 185 P.3d 453 (Or. 2008).
“” ORS 475.125(3)(a). If defendant were correct that “possess” does not include persons who handle or transport controlled substances at another’s direction, then there would have been no need for the legislature to provide that common carriers or agents lawfully may possess…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 475.125(3)(c) — 1 case
State v. Fries, 158 P.3d 10 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).
“ORS 475.125 provides exemptions from criminal liability for the possession of a controlled substance in ORS 475.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.