475C.489
Marijuana as crop; exceptions to permitted uses. (1) Marijuana is:
(a) A crop for
the purposes of “farm use” as defined in ORS 215.203;
(b) A crop for
purposes of a “farm” and “farming practice,” both as defined in ORS 30.930;
(c) A product of
farm use as described in ORS 308A.062; and
(d) The product
of an agricultural activity for purposes of ORS 568.909.
(2)
Notwithstanding ORS chapters 195, 196, 197, 197A, 215 and 227, the following
are not permitted uses on land designated for exclusive farm use:
(a) A new
dwelling used in conjunction with a marijuana crop;
(b) A farm stand,
as described in ORS 215.213 (1)(r) or 215.283 (1)(o), used in conjunction with
a marijuana crop; and
(c) A commercial
activity, as described in ORS 215.213 (2)(c) or 215.283 (2)(a), carried on in
conjunction with a marijuana crop.
(3) A county may
allow the production of marijuana as a farm use on land zoned for farm or
forest use in the same manner as the production of marijuana is allowed in
exclusive farm use zones under this section and ORS 215.213, 215.283 and
475C.053.
(4) This section
applies to:
(a) Marijuana
producers that hold a license issued under ORS 475C.065;
(b) Persons
registered under ORS 475C.792 and designated to produce marijuana by one or
more persons who hold valid registry identification cards issued under ORS
475C.783; and
(c) For the
purpose of producing marijuana or propagating immature marijuana plants,
researchers of cannabis that hold a certificate issued under ORS 475C.289. [Formerly
475B.526]
Notes of Decisions
State ex rel. Elitextrx, LLC v. Siegel, 545 P.3d 1269 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“” ORS 475C.489(1)(a), (b). Under ORS 475C.449(2), a city or county can adopt “reasonable regulations” on the operation of marijuana businesses, including marijuana production.”
State ex rel. Elitextrx, LLC v. Siegel, 545 P.3d 1269 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“” ORS 475C.489(1)(a), (b). Under ORS 475C.449(2), a city or county can adopt “reasonable regulations” on the operation of marijuana businesses, including marijuana production.”
State ex rel. Elitextrx, LLC v. Siegel, 545 P.3d 1269 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“” ORS 475C.489(1)(a), (b). Under ORS 475C.449(2), a city or county can adopt “reasonable regulations” on the operation of marijuana businesses, including marijuana production.”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 475C.489(1)(a): 3 cases
State ex rel. Elitextrx, LLC v. Siegel, 545 P.3d 1269 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“” ORS 475C.489(1)(a), (b). Under ORS 475C.449(2), a city or county can adopt “reasonable regulations” on the operation of marijuana businesses, including marijuana production.”
State ex rel. Elitextrx, LLC v. Siegel, 545 P.3d 1269 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“” ORS 475C.489(1)(a), (b). Under ORS 475C.449(2), a city or county can adopt “reasonable regulations” on the operation of marijuana businesses, including marijuana production.”
State ex rel. Elitextrx, LLC v. Siegel, 545 P.3d 1269 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
“” ORS 475C.489(1)(a), (b). Under ORS 475C.449(2), a city or county can adopt “reasonable regulations” on the operation of marijuana businesses, including marijuana production.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.