Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 607.992 (2026)

Penalties

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      607.992 Penalties. (1) A person that intentionally, knowingly or recklessly violates a provision of this chapter is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.

      (2) Except as provided in subsection (3) of this section, a person that violates a provision of this chapter, but does not act intentionally, knowingly or recklessly, commits a Class B violation.

      (3)(a) A person that violates ORS 607.045, but does not act intentionally, knowingly or recklessly, commits a Class D violation if the person does not have a previous conviction for a violation of ORS 607.045. As used in this paragraph, “previous conviction” means a conviction entered before the commission of the current violation of ORS 607.045.

      (b) Notwithstanding ORS 153.019 or any other requirement pertaining to Class D violation fine amounts, the presumptive fine for a violation described in this subsection is $60. [1967 c.113 §3 (enacted in lieu of 607.990); 2013 c.312 §5]

_______________

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1982–1988 · leading case: Dunlap v. Dickson, 765 P.2d 203 (Or. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dunlap v. Dickson, 765 P.2d 203 (Or. 1988). · cites it 2× “045(1), when read with ORS 607.992, 2 creates criminal liability.”
Watzig v. Tobin, 642 P.2d 651 (Or. 1982). “ORS 607.992. *656 The plaintiff asserts that the trial court should have given the following instruction: “You are instructed that the injury to plaintiff occurred within the area designated by this statute.”
Schwerdt v. Myers, 683 P.2d 547 (Or. 1984). · cites it 2× “” ORS 607.992 “Violation of any provision of this chapter is a misdemeanor.”
Schwerdt v. Myers, 669 P.2d 1147 (Or. Ct. App. 1983). “9, extending from the north boundary of Tillamook County to the south boundary of Lane County.”
Dunlap v. Dickson, 754 P.2d 27 (Or. Ct. App. 1988). “See ORS 607.992. “ORS 607.044 expressly creates civil liability against one who permits livestock to run at large in a livestock district.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.