Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 646.090 (2026)

Inducing or receiving price discrimination prohibited

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      646.090 Inducing or receiving price discrimination prohibited. No person engaged in commerce or food commerce, or both, in the course of such commerce, shall knowingly induce or receive a discrimination in price which is prohibited by ORS 646.040 to 646.080.

 

      646.100 [Amended by 1963 s.s. c.2 §3; repealed by 1975 c.255 §17]

 

      646.105 [1963 s.s. c.2 §2; repealed by 1975 c.255 §17]

 

      646.110 [Repealed by 1975 c.255 §17]

 

      646.120 [Repealed by 1975 c.255 §17]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1978–2026 · leading case: Top Serv. Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate Ins., 582 P.2d 1365 (Or. 1978).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Top Serv. Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate Ins., 582 P.2d 1365 (Or. 1978). · cites it 2× “The obligation of the recipient is stated in ORS 646.090, which reads: No person engaged in commerce or food commerce, or both, in the course of such commerce, shall knowingly induce or receive a discrimination in price which is prohibited by ORS 646.”
EcoShield Pest Solutions Portland, LLC v. Grit Mktg., LLC (D. Or. 2025). · cites it 3× “070, inducing price discrimination under ORS 646.090, monopolization under ORS 646.”
Ecoshield Pest Solutions Portland, LLC v. Grit Mktg., LLC; Zachary Seager; & Corbin Hansen (D. Or. 2026). “070, and ORS 646.090; (5) state antitrust violations under ORS 646.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.