Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 646.563 (2026)

Telephone solicitation of party who states desire not to be contacted; prohibited actions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      646.563 Telephone solicitation of party who states desire not to be contacted; prohibited actions. (1) A person engages in an unlawful practice if:

      (a) During a telephone solicitation, the called or texted party states a desire not to be called or texted again and the person making the telephone solicitation makes a subsequent telephone solicitation of the called or texted party at that number.

      (b) The person initiates a telephone solicitation outside the hours of 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. or initiates a solicitation more than three separate times to a party within a 24-hour period, unless the person has an established business relationship with the party.

      (c) The person during a telephone solicitation misrepresents or falsifies:

      (A) The person’s identity or the identity of another person on behalf of which the person makes the telephone solicitation; or

      (B) The purpose of the telephone solicitation.

      (2) For the purpose of complying with the requirements of this section, a person may rely on the area code of a telephone number for a mobile telephone to determine whether the telephone number is for a party located in this state. [1989 c.622 §9; 2001 c.924 §15; 2025 c.580 §2]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Madsen v. Harris (D. Or. 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Madsen v. Harris (D. Or. 2022). “ORS 646.563 provides that “[a] person engages in an unlawful practice if, during a telephone solicitation, the called party states a desire not to be called again and the person making the telephone solicitation makes a subsequent telephone solicitation of the called party at…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.