Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 646A.150 (2026)

Applicability of ORS 646A.150 to 646A.172

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      646A.150 Applicability of ORS 646A.150 to 646A.172. (1) ORS 646A.150 to 646A.172:

      (a) Create a legal framework within which service contracts may be sold in this state;

      (b) Encourage innovation in the marketing and development of more economical and effective means of providing services under service contracts, while placing the risk of innovation on the obligors rather than on consumers; and

      (c) Permit and encourage fair and effective competition among different systems of providing and paying for service contracts.

      (2) ORS 646A.150 to 646A.172 do not apply to:

      (a) Warranties; or

      (b) Maintenance agreements. [Formerly 646.263]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2023–2023 · leading case: TruNorth Warranty Plans of North Am. v. DCBS, 536 P.3d 24 (Or. Ct. App. 2023).
TruNorth Warranty Plans of North Am. v. DCBS, 536 P.3d 24 (Or. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 4× “vices INS200003; A177597 536 P3d 24 Petitioner, an out-of-state company that sells warranty agreements for commercial vehicles, seeks judicial review of a final order of the Department of Consumer and Business Services (DCBS) imposing a $14,000 civil penalty and ordering…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 646A.150(1)(a) — 1 case
TruNorth Warranty Plans of North Am. v. DCBS, 536 P.3d 24 (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “vices INS200003; A177597 536 P3d 24 Petitioner, an out-of-state company that sells warranty agreements for commercial vehicles, seeks judicial review of a final order of the Department of Consumer and Business Services (DCBS) imposing a $14,000 civil penalty and ordering…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 646A.150(1)(b) — 1 case
TruNorth Warranty Plans of North Am. v. DCBS, 536 P.3d 24 (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “vices INS200003; A177597 536 P3d 24 Petitioner, an out-of-state company that sells warranty agreements for commercial vehicles, seeks judicial review of a final order of the Department of Consumer and Business Services (DCBS) imposing a $14,000 civil penalty and ordering…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.