Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 655.525 (2026)

Procedure for review of claims

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      655.525 Procedure for review of claims. Except as otherwise provided by rule of the Oregon Department of Administrative Services, an adult in custody or the beneficiary of the adult in custody may obtain review of action taken on the claim as provided in ORS 656.283 to 656.304. [1963 c.527 §6; 1965 c.285 §79e; 1983 c.740 §241a; 1995 c.384 §22; 2019 c.213 §109]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1973–1990 · leading case: Dept. of Just. v. Spear, 783 P.2d 998 (Or. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dept. of Just. v. Spear, 783 P.2d 998 (Or. 1989). “4 ORS 655.525 provides: “An inmate or the beneficiary of the inmate may obtain review of action taken on the claim as provided in ORS 656.”
State v. Spear, 767 P.2d 928 (Or. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 7× “ORS 655.525; ORS 656.298(6); ORS 183.482(7) and (8); Armstrong v.”
Johnson v. State Accident Ins. Fund, 516 P.2d 1289 (Or. 1973). · cites it 2× “* * *” Just as these two statutes were designed to incorporate all of the relevant provisions for benefits and for filing claims (to the extent not inconsistent with the inmates compensation statutes), we think that ORS 655.525 was intended to incorporate all of the relevant…”
State, Dep't of Just. v. Bryant, 790 P.2d 42 (Or. Ct. App. 1990). “See ORS 655.525; ORS 656.283(2). The Board made an alternative holding that, even if it were only to review for abuse of discretion, it would overturn the decision not to waive the time limit.”
Johnson v. State Accident Ins. Fund, 510 P.2d 572 (Or. Ct. App. 1973). · cites it 4× “On oral argument, however, appellant concedes this contention is erroneous and that attorney fees on appeal from the circuit court, pursuant to ORS 655.525, ② are allowable to the extent provided in ORS 656.”
Meyers v. State Accident Ins. Fund, 590 P.2d 285 (Or. Ct. App. 1979). “In revising ORS ch 656 to eliminate circuit court review and provide for direct review from the Workers’ Compensation Board in this court, the legislature neglected to amend ORS 655.525, leaving an irrelevent reference to circuit court review.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.