Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 675.150 (2026)

Enforcement procedures

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

675.150 Enforcement procedures. The Oregon Board of Psychology may institute and commence injunction proceedings in any circuit court in Oregon to enjoin the unlawful practice of psychology. In any such proceeding it shall not be necessary to show that any person is individually injured by the actions complained of. If the person complained of is found by the court to have unlawfully engaged in practice of psychology, the court may enjoin the person from so practicing. Procedure in such cases shall be the same as any other injunction suit. The remedy by injunction hereby given is in addition to criminal prosecution and punishment. [1973 c.777 §13; 2017 c.6 §21]

MENTAL HEALTH REGULATORY AGENCY

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 2000–2008 · leading case: Cochran v. Bd. of Psychologist Examiners, 15 P.3d 73 (Or. Ct. App. 2000).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Cochran v. Bd. of Psychologist Examiners, 15 P.3d 73 (Or. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “110(12) authorizes the Board "[t]o formulate a code of professional conduct for the practice of psychology giving particular consideration to the Ethical Standards of Psychologists, promulgated by American Psychological Association." The statute also gives the Board rule-making…”

Lee v. Emp. Dep't, 190 P.3d 453 (Or. Ct. App. 2008). “095, and to the calculation of unemployment benefits paid to employees, ORS 675.150. See ORS 657.105. Consequently, the wage used to calculate unemployment taxes is the same wage used to calculate unemployment benefits.”

Munks v. Emp. Dep't, 37 P.3d 213 (Or. Ct. App. 2001). “Claimant contends that she was discharged by employer and is entitled to benefits under ORS 675.150. We affirm. Claimant was referred by the Employment Department to defendant Sitel Corporation (Sitel) for potential employment.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.