Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 742.521 (2026)

Conditions applicable to arbitration proceedings

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      742.521 Conditions applicable to arbitration proceedings. (1) Arbitration proceedings under ORS 742.520 shall be conducted under local court rules in the county where the arbitration is held.

      (2) Findings and awards made in an arbitration proceeding under this section:

      (a) Are binding on the parties to the arbitration proceeding;

      (b) Are not binding on any other party; and

      (c) May not be used for the purpose of collateral estoppel. [2007 c.328 §3]

 

      Note: 742.521 was added to and made a part of ORS chapter 742 by legislative action but was not added to any smaller series therein. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: Garcia Hernandez v. Farmers Ins. Co., 345 Or. App. 407 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Garcia Hernandez v. Farmers Ins. Co., 345 Or. App. 407 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “See ORS 742.521(2)(c) (findings and awards in PIP arbitration “[m]ay not be used for the purpose of collateral estoppel”).”
Garcia Hernandez v. Farmers Ins. Co., 345 Or. App. 407 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “See ORS 742.521(2)(c) (findings and awards in PIP arbitration “[m]ay not be used for the purpose of collateral estoppel”).”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 742.521(2)(c): 2 cases
Garcia Hernandez v. Farmers Ins. Co., 345 Or. App. 407 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “See ORS 742.521(2)(c) (findings and awards in PIP arbitration “[m]ay not be used for the purpose of collateral estoppel”).”
Garcia Hernandez v. Farmers Ins. Co., 345 Or. App. 407 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “See ORS 742.521(2)(c) (findings and awards in PIP arbitration “[m]ay not be used for the purpose of collateral estoppel”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.