809.100
Hearing on proposed cancellation or refusal; judicial review. (1) When the Department of
Transportation proposes to cancel or refuse to issue or renew title or
registration, opportunity for hearing shall be accorded as provided in ORS
chapter 183.
(2) Judicial
review of orders under this section shall be in accordance with ORS chapter
183. [1983 c.338 §282; 1985 c.16 §114; 1985 c.401 §11; 1993 c.233 §54]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases, 2007–2007 · leading case:
Rooklidge v. Dmv, 174 P.3d 1120 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).
Rooklidge v. Dmv, 174 P.3d 1120 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 4× “100 requires a hearing when the Department of Transportation proposes to cancel or refuses to renew a vehicle's title or registration: "When the Department of Transportation proposes to cancel or refuse to issue or renew title or registration, opportunity for hearing shall be…”
Rooklidge v. Driver & Motor Veh. Servs. Branch of the Oregon Dep't of Transp., 174 P.3d 1120 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 4× “100 requires a hearing when the Department of Transportation proposes to cancel or refuses to renew a vehicle’s title or registration: *179 “When the Department of Transportation proposes to cancel or refuse to issue or renew title or registration, opportunity for hearing shall…”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 809.100(1): 2 cases
Rooklidge v. Dmv, 174 P.3d 1120 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).
“100 requires a hearing when the Department of Transportation proposes to cancel or refuses to renew a vehicle's title or registration: "When the Department of Transportation proposes to cancel or refuse to issue or renew title or registration, opportunity for hearing shall be…”
Rooklidge v. Driver & Motor Veh. Servs. Branch of the Oregon Dep't of Transp., 174 P.3d 1120 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).
“100 requires a hearing when the Department of Transportation proposes to cancel or refuses to renew a vehicle’s title or registration: *179 “When the Department of Transportation proposes to cancel or refuse to issue or renew title or registration, opportunity for hearing shall…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.