Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 811.215 (2026)

Exemptions from safety belt requirements

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      811.215 Exemptions from safety belt requirements. ORS 811.210 does not apply to:

      (1) Privately owned commercial vehicles that are being used for the transportation of persons for compensation or profit. The exemption in this subsection does not apply to any of the following:

      (a) Motor carriers, as defined in ORS 825.005, when operating in interstate commerce.

      (b) Vehicles designed and used for the transportation of 15 or fewer persons, including the driver, except that the operator of a vehicle described in this paragraph is not required to:

      (A) Be properly secured with a safety belt or safety harness as required by ORS 811.210 if the operator is a taxicab operator; or

      (B) Ensure that a passenger is properly secured with a child safety system as described in ORS 811.210 (2)(a), (b) or (c).

      (2) Any vehicle not required to be equipped with safety belts or safety harnesses at the time the vehicle was manufactured, unless safety belts or safety harnesses have been installed in the vehicle.

      (3) Any vehicle exempted by ORS 815.080 from requirements to be equipped upon sale with safety belts or safety harnesses.

      (4) Any person for whom a certificate is issued by the Department of Transportation under ORS 811.220.

      (5) Any person who is a passenger in a vehicle if all seating positions in the vehicle are occupied by other persons.

      (6) Any person who is being transported while in the custody of a police officer or any law enforcement agency.

      (7) Any person who is driving a vehicle while on a newspaper or mail route for the purpose of and while actually engaged in delivering newspapers or mail in the regular course of work.

      (8) Any person who is riding in an ambulance for the purpose of administering medical aid to another person in the ambulance, if being secured by a safety belt or safety harness would substantially inhibit the administration of medical aid.

      (9) Any person who is reading utility meters in the regular course of work.

      (10) Any person who is employed to operate a vehicle owned by a mass transit district while the vehicle is being used for the transportation of passengers in the public transportation system of the district.

      (11) Any person who is collecting solid waste or recyclable materials in the regular course of work.

      (12) Any person who is employed to operate a vehicle owned by a tribal government public transportation system while the vehicle is being used for the transportation of passengers in the public transportation system of the tribal government. [1985 c.619 §3; 1987 c.138 §3; 1991 c.2 §2; 1997 c.509 §3; 1999 c.1057 §4; 2003 c.589 §5; 2005 c.244 §1; 2005 c.770 §8; 2007 c.200 §1; 2007 c.601 §3; 2018 c.93 §37; 2019 c.398 §1]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1987–2022 · leading case: State v. Bourget-Goddard, 993 P.2d 814 (Or. Ct. App. 1999).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Bourget-Goddard, 993 P.2d 814 (Or. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× ““(2) To comply with this section: * * ❖ * “(b) A person who is at least four years of age or weighs more than 40 pounds must be properly secured with a safety belt or harness * * ORS 811.215 describes various exemptions from the requirements of ORS 811.”
State v. Rivera, 855 P.2d 188 (Or. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 3× “ORS 811.215 provides, in part: “ORS 811.210 does not apply to: “(2) Any vehicle not required to be equipped with safety belts or safety harnesses at the time the vehicle was manufactured, unless safety belts or safety harnesses have been installed in the vehicle.”
State v. Perrin, 929 P.2d 1016 (Or. Ct. App. 1996). “” ORS 811.215(1) describes vehicles not included in the exemption from seat regulations as “vehicles commonly known as pickup trucks.”
Oregon Traffic Saf. Now, Inc. v. Roberts, 745 P.2d 1218 (Or. 1987). · cites it 2× “ORS 811.215 is amended to read: “ORS 811.”
State v. Donaldson, 510 P.3d 943 (Or. Ct. App. 2022). “, ORS 811.215(7) (safety-belt requirement “does not apply to * * * [a]ny person who is driv- ing a vehicle while on a newspaper or mail route”); ORS 811.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 811.215(1) — 1 case
State v. Perrin, 929 P.2d 1016 (Or. Ct. App. 1996). “” ORS 811.215(1) describes vehicles not included in the exemption from seat regulations as “vehicles commonly known as pickup trucks.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 811.215(2) — 1 case
State v. Rivera, 855 P.2d 188 (Or. Ct. App. 1993). “ORS 811.215 provides, in part: “ORS 811.210 does not apply to: “(2) Any vehicle not required to be equipped with safety belts or safety harnesses at the time the vehicle was manufactured, unless safety belts or safety harnesses have been installed in the vehicle.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 811.215(5) — 1 case
State v. Rivera, 855 P.2d 188 (Or. Ct. App. 1993). “ORS 811.215 provides, in part: “ORS 811.210 does not apply to: “(2) Any vehicle not required to be equipped with safety belts or safety harnesses at the time the vehicle was manufactured, unless safety belts or safety harnesses have been installed in the vehicle.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 811.215(7) — 1 case
State v. Donaldson, 510 P.3d 943 (Or. Ct. App. 2022). “, ORS 811.215(7) (safety-belt requirement “does not apply to * * * [a]ny person who is driv- ing a vehicle while on a newspaper or mail route”); ORS 811.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.