Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 811.710 (2026)

Failure to perform duties of driver when animal is injured; penalty

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

811.710 Failure to perform duties of driver when animal is injured; penalty. (1) A driver of a vehicle who knows or has reason to believe that the driver’s vehicle was involved in a collision commits the offense of failure to perform the duties of a driver when an animal is injured if the driver’s vehicle injures or kills a domestic animal and the driver does not perform all of the following duties:

(a) Immediately stop the driver’s vehicle at the scene of the collision or as close to the scene of the collision as possible and reasonably investigate what the driver’s vehicle struck. Every stop required under this paragraph should be made without obstructing traffic more than is necessary.

(b) Make a reasonable effort to determine the nature of the animal’s injuries.

(d) Immediately report the injury to the animal’s owner.

(e) If unable to contact the owner of the animal, notify a police officer.

(f) If the driver discovers only after leaving the scene of the collision that the driver has reason to believe that the driver’s vehicle was involved in a collision that injured or killed a domestic animal, the driver shall as soon as reasonably possible make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of this section.

(2) The requirements under this section for a driver to stop and attend an injured animal depend on the traffic hazards then existing.

(3) As used in this section, “reason to believe” means that the driver is aware of a circumstance that would cause a reasonable person to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the driver’s vehicle has been in a collision. The risk must be of such nature or degree that failure to be aware of it constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that a reasonable person would observe in the situation.

(4) The offense described in this section, failure to perform the duties of a driver when an animal is injured, is a Class B traffic violation. [1983 c.338 §574; 2018 c.22 §4; 2024 c.63 §16]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 2001–2017 · leading case: State v. Hval, 25 P.3d 958 (Or. Ct. App. 2001).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Hval, 25 P.3d 958 (Or. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 3× “Finally, ORS 811.710 describes a driver’s duties when the driver knowingly strikes and injures a domestic animal and makes the offense a Class B traffic infraction.”

State v. Moncada, 250 P.3d 31 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). “Finally, ORS 811.710 describes a driver’s duties when the driver knowingly strikes and injures a domestic animal and makes the offense a Class B traffic infraction.”

State v. Bassett, 259 P.3d 953 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). “3 An additional statute, ORS 811.710, applies when an accident results in injury to a domestic animal and is a Class B violation.”

State v. Anderson, 380 P.3d 1201 (Or. Ct. App. 2016). “As the state charged defendant here, a person commits the offense of failure to perform the duties of a driver when property is damaged if “the person is the driver of any vehicle involved in an accident that results only in damage” to another driver’s vehicle and fails to…”

State v. Garcia-Cisneros, 397 P.3d 49 (Or. Ct. App. 2017). “700 (duties of a driver when an accident results in property damage); ORS 811.710 (duties of a driver when the driver knowingly strikes and injures a domestic animal).”

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 811.710(1) — 1 case

State v. Hval, 25 P.3d 958 (Or. Ct. App. 2001). “Finally, ORS 811.710 describes a driver’s duties when the driver knowingly strikes and injures a domestic animal and makes the offense a Class B traffic infraction.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.