Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 830.990 (2026)

Penalties

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      830.990 Penalties. (1) Violation of ORS 830.302 by a person operating a motorboat or violation of ORS 830.565 by a person operating a sailboat that is at least 12 feet in length or a motorboat is a Class D violation. Notwithstanding ORS 153.019, the presumptive fine for a violation of ORS 830.302 or 830.565 by a person operating a motorboat is $50.

      (2) A person who violates ORS 830.050, 830.088, 830.090, 830.092, 830.094, 830.215, 830.230, 830.415, 830.624, 830.710, 830.720, 830.770, 830.780, 830.810, 830.850 or 830.855, or rules adopted to carry out the purposes of those statutes, commits a Class D violation.

      (3) A person who violates ORS 830.220, 830.240, 830.245, 830.250, 830.375, 830.475 (4), 830.480, 830.785, 830.805 or 830.825, or rules adopted to carry out the purposes of those statutes, commits a Class C violation.

      (4) A person who violates ORS 830.110, 830.175, 830.180, 830.185, 830.187, 830.195, 830.210, 830.225, 830.235, 830.260, 830.300, 830.315 (2) and (3), 830.335, 830.340, 830.345, 830.350, 830.355, 830.360, 830.362, 830.365, 830.370, 830.410, 830.420, 830.425, 830.495, 830.560, 830.649, 830.775, 830.795 or 830.830, or rules adopted to carry out the purposes of those statutes, commits a Class B violation.

      (5) A person who violates ORS 830.305, 830.390 or 830.944, or rules adopted to carry out the purposes of those statutes, commits a Class A violation.

      (6)(a) Notwithstanding subsection (4) of this section, a person who violates ORS 830.649 and has one or more prior convictions for violation of ORS 830.649 within a three-year period preceding the date of the person’s current conviction, commits a Class A violation.

      (b) In addition to the penalty imposed under this subsection, the court shall:

      (A) Order the person not to operate a boat for a period of one year; and

      (B) Order the person to complete a boating safety course approved by the State Marine Board.

      (7) A person who violates ORS 830.591 commits a Class C misdemeanor.

      (8) A person who violates ORS 830.383 commits a Class B misdemeanor.

      (9) A person who violates ORS 830.035 (2), 830.053, 830.315 (1), 830.325, 830.475 (1), 830.730 or 830.955 (1) commits a Class A misdemeanor.

      (10) A person who violates ORS 830.475 (2) commits a Class C felony. [Formerly 488.991; 1991 c.759 §7; 1997 c.74 §2; 1997 c.568 §5; 1997 c.737 §6; 1999 c.550 §4; 1999 c.692 §12; 1999 c.716 §13a; 1999 c.1051 §95; 2003 c.157 §1; 2005 c.299 §3; 2009 c.303 §3; 2009 c.764 §12; 2011 c.381 §1; 2011 c.597 §329; 2013 c.1 §97; 2013 c.186 §4; 2013 c.680 §17; 2015 c.27 §63; 2019 c.154 §13; 2019 c.155 §6; 2019 c.431 §2; 2019 c.507 §11a; 2019 c.651 §7]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1991–2003 · leading case: State v. Greason, 809 P.2d 695 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Greason, 809 P.2d 695 (Or. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “Because boating under the influence of intoxicants is a Class A misdemeanor, ORS 830.990(3), and the crime was committed in Officer Gregg's presence, he had authority to arrest defendant without a warrant.”
State v. Lecarros, 66 P.3d 543 (Or. Ct. App. 2003). “325(1); ORS 830.990(5). At trial, defendant moved for exclusion of all the evidence obtained as a result of his encounter with the deputies, arguing that the evidence derived from a “stop” that was *108 unlawful under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution and the…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 830.990(3) — 1 case
State v. Greason, 809 P.2d 695 (Or. Ct. App. 1991). “Because boating under the influence of intoxicants is a Class A misdemeanor, ORS 830.990(3), and the crime was committed in Officer Gregg's presence, he had authority to arrest defendant without a warrant.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 830.990(5) — 1 case
State v. Lecarros, 66 P.3d 543 (Or. Ct. App. 2003). “325(1); ORS 830.990(5). At trial, defendant moved for exclusion of all the evidence obtained as a result of his encounter with the deputies, arguing that the evidence derived from a “stop” that was *108 unlawful under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution and the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.