Pa. Cons. Stat. » 15 Pa. Cons. Stat. (CORPORATIONS) / Chapter 19
Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

15 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1980 (2026)

 Dissolution by domestication (Repealed).

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 1980.  Dissolution by domestication (Repealed).

 

2014 Repeal.  Section 1980 was repealed October 22, 2014, P.L.2640, No.172, effective July 1, 2015.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2010–2013 · leading case: Glenda Johnson v. SmithKline Beecham Corp, 724 F.3d 337 (3rd Cir. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Glenda Johnson v. SmithKline Beecham Corp, 724 F.3d 337 (3rd Cir. 2013). · cites it 4× “” 15 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § 1980. Despite that change in entity form and domicile, SmithKline Beecham was, at least operationally, largely unaffected by its conversion to GSK LLC.”
Johnson v. Smithkline Beecham Corp., 853 F. Supp. 2d 487 (E.D. Pa. 2012). · cites it 2× “Plaintiffs ignore that SmithKline Beecham domesticated itself as a Delaware corporation pursuant to 15 Pa. Cons.Stat. § 1980, and then converted to a Delaware limited liability company.”
Hoch v. Eli Lilly & Co., 736 F. Supp. 2d 219 (D.D.C. 2010). · cites it 2× “When SBK filed Articles of Dissolution in Pennsylvania, it did so pursuant to 15 Pa.C.S. § 1980. See Articles of Dissolution, attached as Ex.”
Glenda Johnson v. SmithKline Beecham Corp (3rd Cir. 2013). · cites it 2× “‖ 15 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § 1980. Despite that change in entity form and domicile, SmithKline Beecham was, at least operationally, largely unaffected by its conversion to GSK LLC.”
Glenda Johnson v. SmithKline Beecham Corp (3rd Cir. 2013). · cites it 2× “” 15 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § 1980. Despite that change in entity form and domicile, SmithKline Beecham was, at least operationally, largely unaffected by its conversion to GSK LLC.”
Hoch v. Eli Lilly & Co. (D.D.C. 2010). · cites it 2× “When SBK filed Articles of Dissolution in Pennsylvania, it did so pursuant to 15 Pa. C.S. § 1980. See Articles of Dissolution, attached as Ex.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.