§ 2707. Propulsion of missiles into an occupied vehicle or onto a roadway.
(a) Occupied vehicles.--Whoever intentionally throws, shoots or propels a rock, stone, brick, or piece of
iron, steel or other like metal, or any deadly or dangerous missile, or fire bomb,
into a vehicle or instrumentality of public transportation that is occupied by one
or more persons commits a misdemeanor of the first degree.
(b) Roadways.--Whoever intentionally throws, shoots, drops or causes to be propelled any solid object,
from an overpass or any other location adjacent to or on a roadway, onto or toward
said roadway shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree.
(July 16, 1975, P.L.62, No.37; Dec. 21, 1998, P.L.1103, No.149, eff. 60 days)
1998 Amendment. Act 149 amended subsec. (b).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
10
cases (
3 in the last 5 years), 1985–2026 · leading case:
Commonwealth v. McCoy, 962 A.2d 1160 (Pa. 2009).
Commonwealth v. McCoy, 962 A.2d 1160 (Pa. 2009).
· cites it 2× “The Commonwealth concludes that appellant's restrictive interpretation of the statute only makes sense if the language "from any location" is omitted entirely, citing to 18 Pa.C.S. § 2707, which prohibits the firing of a weapon "into a vehicle" but does not contain the language…”
Kiehl v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 747 A.2d 954 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2000).
“Section 2707(b) of the Crimes Code, as amended, 18 Pa.C.S. § 2707(b). 5 . A "certified legal intern” with the Harrisburg Civil Law Clinic represented Claimant at the referee hearing.”
Commonwealth v. Smith, V., Aplt. (Pa. 2025).
· cites it 2× “2d at 1100 (citing 18 Pa.C.S. § 2707 (it is a crime to throw a rock or any deadly or dangerous missile [J-24-2025] - 7 into a vehicle “that is occupied by one or more persons”); 18 Pa.”
Com. v. Woodham, A. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016).
“§ 2502(c), and propulsion of missiles into an occupied vehicle, 18 Pa.C.S. § 2707(a). At docket number CP-40- CR-0001322-2008, Appellant was found guilty of criminal attempt (homicide), 18 Pa.”
Com. v. Wilson, A. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018).
“Upon his arrival, Officer Monaghan observed Appellant walking westbound on Ridge ____________________________________________ 118 Pa.C.S. § 2707(a); 18 Pa.C.S. § 2705; 18 Pa.”
Com. v. Wilson, A. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018).
“Upon his arrival, Officer Monaghan observed Appellant walking westbound on Ridge ____________________________________________ 118 Pa.C.S. § 2707(a); 18 Pa.C.S. § 2705; 18 Pa.”
Com. v. Krimmel, W. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2024).
“Appellant then filed this timely ____________________________________________ 1 18 Pa.C.S. §§ 2707, 907 and 2705. -2- J-S44038-23 appeal.”
Com. v. McDevitt, A. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2026).
“Moreover, Appellant claims that the Commonwealth failed to prove that she acted with the necessary mens rea and that she intentionally fired a missile into the Victim’s Chevy as required by 18 Pa.C.S. § 2707. See id.8 ____________________________________________ 8 Appellant’s…”
In re Meals Suspension, 37 Pa. D. & C.3d 276 (1985).
“See,’for example, 18 Pa. C.S. §2707 concerning the crime of propulsion of missiles into a vehicle occupied by “one or more persons.”
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2707(a) — 4 cases
Com. v. Woodham, A. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016).
“§ 2502(c), and propulsion of missiles into an occupied vehicle, 18 Pa.C.S. § 2707(a). At docket number CP-40- CR-0001322-2008, Appellant was found guilty of criminal attempt (homicide), 18 Pa.”
Com. v. Wilson, A. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018).
“Upon his arrival, Officer Monaghan observed Appellant walking westbound on Ridge ____________________________________________ 118 Pa.C.S. § 2707(a); 18 Pa.C.S. § 2705; 18 Pa.”
Com. v. Wilson, A. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018).
“Upon his arrival, Officer Monaghan observed Appellant walking westbound on Ridge ____________________________________________ 118 Pa.C.S. § 2707(a); 18 Pa.C.S. § 2705; 18 Pa.”
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2707(b) — 1 case
Kiehl v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 747 A.2d 954 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2000).
“Section 2707(b) of the Crimes Code, as amended, 18 Pa.C.S. § 2707(b). 5 . A "certified legal intern” with the Harrisburg Civil Law Clinic represented Claimant at the referee hearing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.