Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

34 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2963 (2026)

  Exotic wildlife possession permits.

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 2963.  Exotic wildlife possession permits.

(a)  Authorization.--The commission may issue permits to persons to possess exotic wildlife which shall authorize the holder to purchase, receive or possess exotic wildlife from any lawful source from within or without this Commonwealth.

(b)  Shelter, care and protection.--No permit provided for in this section shall be granted until the commission is satisfied that the provisions for housing and caring for such exotic wildlife and for protecting the public are proper and adequate and in accordance with the standards established by the commission.

(c)  Unlawful acts.--It is unlawful for any person to:

(1)  Possess, purchase or receive exotic wildlife, without first securing a permit to possess exotic wildlife issued under this section or regulations pertaining to this section.

(2)  Release exotic wildlife into the wild.

(3)  Fail to exercise due care in safeguarding the public from attack by exotic wildlife.

(4)  Recklessly engage in conduct which places or may place another person in danger of attack by exotic wildlife.

(d)  Penalty.--

(1)  A violation of this section relating to permits is a summary offense of the third degree.

(2)  Any other violation of this section is a summary offense of the fifth degree.

(3)  Each day of violation shall constitute a separate offense, but under no circumstances shall the accumulated penalty for purposes of a field receipt exceed $300. There shall be no limit on any accumulated penalty a court may assess.

(e)  Discretion of director.--In addition to the penalties provided, the director may, for any violation of this section, revoke or suspend any permit and order the disposal of any exotic wildlife held.

(Apr. 20, 1988, P.L.353, No.55, eff. 60 days)

 

1988 Amendment.  Act 55 amended subsec. (c).

Cross References.  Section 2963 is referred to in section 2965 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1988–2014 · leading case: Commonwealth v. Raban, 85 A.3d 467 (Pa. 2014).
Commonwealth v. Raban, 85 A.3d 467 (Pa. 2014). “" 34 Pa.C.S. § 2963(c)(3)-(4) (emphasis added).”
Commonwealth v. Reynolds, 876 A.2d 1088 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2005). “Likewise, Section 2963(a) provides that "[t]he commission may issue permits to persons to possess exotic wildlife which shall authorize the holder to purchase, receive or possess exotic wildlife from any lawful source from within or without this Commonwealth.”
Fairview Twp. v. Schaefer, 562 A.2d 989 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1989). · cites it 8× “The Pennsylvania Game Commission has authorized Schaefer's possession of the tiger by issuing, under the guidelines of section 2963 of the Game and Wildlife Code, 34 Pa.C.S. § 2963, an "Exotic Wildlife Possession Permit.”
Fairview Twp. v. Schaefer, 50 Pa. D. & C.3d 205 (1988). “Defendant relies on Title 34 Pa.C.S. §2963 of the Pennsylvania Game Law dealing with the possession of exotic wildlife to argue that this court is without proper jurisdiction because the Pennsylvania Legislature has pre-empted the field by endowing the Pennsylvania Game…”
— 34 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2963(a) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Reynolds, 876 A.2d 1088 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2005). “Likewise, Section 2963(a) provides that "[t]he commission may issue permits to persons to possess exotic wildlife which shall authorize the holder to purchase, receive or possess exotic wildlife from any lawful source from within or without this Commonwealth.”
— 34 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2963(c)(3) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Raban, 85 A.3d 467 (Pa. 2014). “" 34 Pa.C.S. § 2963(c)(3)-(4) (emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.