Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

37 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 501 (2026)

 Short title of chapter.

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

 

 

CHAPTER 5

HISTORIC PRESERVATION

 

Sec.

 501.  Short title of chapter.

 502.  Powers and duties of commission.

 503.  Inclusion of property on register.

 504.  Historic Preservation Board.

 505.  Powers and duties of board.

 506.  Archaelogical field investigations on Commonwealth land.

 507.  Cooperation by public officials with the commission.

 508.  Interagency cooperation.

 509.  Transfer of Commonwealth land involving historic resources.

 510.  Approval of construction affecting historic resources.

 511.  Criminal penalties.

 512.  Enforcement of historic preservation laws and policies.

 

Enactment.  Chapter 5 was added May 26, 1988, P.L.414, No.72, effective immediately.

§ 501.  Short title of chapter.

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Historic Preservation Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1991–2013 · leading case: In re Barnes Found., 74 A.3d 129 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2013).
In re Barnes Found., 74 A.3d 129 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2013). “Feudale purports to invoke the Historic Preservation Act, 37 Pa.Cons.Stat.Ann. § 501 et seq., as a basis for standing.”
United Artists Theater Circuit, Inc. v. City of Philadelphia, 595 A.2d 6 (Pa. 1991). “72, 37 Pa.C.S. § 501, et seq., private property may not be included on the historic register if the owner objects.”
Maryland & Pennsylvania R.R. Pres. Auth. v. Agric. Lands Condemnation Approval Bd., 704 A.2d 1149 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1998). “Pennsylvania’s historical preservation statute, 37 Pa.C.S. §§ 501 — 512, does not give priority to historical preservation over agricultural lands.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.