Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9570 (2026)

 Short title of subchapter.

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

 

 

SUBCHAPTER D

UNITARY REVIEW IN DEATH PENALTY CASES

 

Sec.

9570.  Short title of subchapter.

9571.  Scope of subchapter.

9572.  Representation of counsel.

9573.  Time for petition; contents of petition.

9574.  Answer to petition.

9575.  Disposition without evidentiary hearing.

9576.  Evidentiary hearing.

9577.  Disposition and appeal.

9578.  Subsequent petitions.

9579.  Certification.

 

Enactment.  Subchapter D was added November 17, 1995, 1st Sp.Sess., P.L.1118, No.32, effective in 60 days.

Applicability.  Section 3(2) of Act 32 of 1995, 1st Sp.Sess, provided that Subchapter D shall apply in all cases in which the death penalty is imposed on or after January 1, 1996.

§ 9570.  Short title of subchapter.

This subchapter shall be known and may be cited as the Capital Unitary Review Act.

 

Suspension by Court Order.  Section 9570 was suspended August 11, 1997, S.Ct. Order.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1997–2000 · leading case: Commonwealth v. Wesley, 753 A.2d 204 (Pa. 2000).
Commonwealth v. Wesley, 753 A.2d 204 (Pa. 2000). · cites it 2× “The trial court appointed counsel to represent Wesley in his Petition for Collateral Review pursuant to the Capital Unitary Review Act (CURA), 42 Pa.C.S. § 9570, et seq., which the trial court subsequently vacated.”
Commonwealth v. Mason, 741 A.2d 708 (Pa. 1999). “New counsel for Appellant filed a petition for collateral review under the Capital Unitary Review Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9570, et seq., 1 which the trial court denied.”
Banks v. Horn, 126 F.3d 206 (3rd Cir. 1997). “1997), which limited death penalty appeals to one “unitary” direct appeal of all issues, barred further review of Banks’ case in the state courts. See Banks III, 928 F.Supp. at 514 . The Commonwealth then filed a motion for reconsideration on the ground that the Capital Unitary…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.