Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes
75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1714 (2026)
Ineligible claimants.
✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
PA-LEGpalegis.us
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 1714. Ineligible claimants.
An owner of a currently registered motor vehicle who does not have financial responsibility or an operator or occupant of a recreational vehicle not intended for highway use, motorcycle, motor-driven cycle, motorized pedalcycle or like type vehicle required to be registered under this title cannot recover first party benefits.
Cross References. Section 1714 is referred to in section 1713 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 26
cases, 1988–2012 · leading case: Swords v. Harleysville Ins. Companies, 883 A.2d 562 (Pa. 2005).
Swords v. Harleysville Ins. Companies, 883 A.2d 562 (Pa. 2005). “Pennland filed an Answer and New Matter, arguing that Section 1714 of the MVFRL, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1714, requires the owner of a vehicle registered with the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation to insure the vehicle as a condition precedent to obtaining first-party benefits…”
Windrim v. Nationwide Ins., 641 A.2d 1154 (Pa. 1994). “75 Pa.C.S. § 1714. [4] Section 477b provides: It shall be unlawful for any insurance company .”
Holland v. Marcy, 883 A.2d 449 (Pa. 2005). “See 75 Pa.C.S. §§ 1714 ("An owner of a currently registered motor vehicle who does not have financial responsibility .”
Lewis v. Erie Ins. Exch., 793 A.2d 143 (Pa. 2002). “, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1714 (providing that “[a]n owner of a currently registered motor vehicle who does not have financial responsibility .”
Burstein v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins., 742 A.2d 684 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1999). “75 Pa.C.S. § 1714 (emphasis added). [10] At the time of the accident, plaintiff was living at his mother's residence.”
Henrich v. Harleysville Ins. Companies, 588 A.2d 50 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1991). “Section 1714 provides: An owner of a currently registered motor vehicle who does not have financial responsibility or an operator of occupant of a recreational vehicle not intended for highway use, motorcycle, motor-driven cycle, motorized pedal-cycle or like type vehicle…”
Kafando v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 704 A.2d 675 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1998). “JOHNSON, Judge: We are asked to determine whether Section 1714 of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1714, bars recovery of first party benefits to a “covered person” who is injured while a passenger in an insured motor vehicle where that claim *676…”
L.S. v. David Eschbach, Jr., Inc., 874 A.2d 1150 (Pa. 2005). “2d 1122, 1123 (1993) (finding no fault with appellate court’s use of principle expressio unius est exelusio altenus in analyzing Section 1714 of the MVFRL, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1714). As previously noted, the object of all statutory interpretation is to ascertain and effectuate the…”
Habbyshaw v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing, 683 A.2d 1281 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1996). “2d 1119 (1991), first of all, the Court addressed the definition of owner for purposes of Section 1714 of the MVFRL, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1714, which precludes an owner of a vehicle who does not have financial responsibility from recovering first party benefits.”
Windrim v. Nationwide Mut. Ins., 602 A.2d 1356 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1992). “75 Pa.Cons.Stat.Ann. § 1714 (Purdon Supp.”
Elder v. Nationwide Ins., 599 A.2d 996 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1991). “The issue presented in this appeal is whether 75 Pa.C.S. § 1714 bars recovery of first party benefits, as a matter of law, by a party who no longer owns a vehicle *293 which nonetheless remained registered in that party’s name in Pennsylvania at the time of an accident from…”
Green v. K & K Ins., 566 A.2d 622 (Pa. 1989). “75 Pa.C.S. § 1714 (emphasis added). Pursuant to this section, an operator or occupant of a motorcycle cannot recover first party benefits.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.