R.I. Gen. Laws
Rhode Island General Laws

R.I. Gen. Laws § 34-28-17 (2026)

Dismissal of complaint, notice of lien, and release of lien upon deposit in court

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section RI-LEGwebserver.rilegislature.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) At any time after the recording of a notice of intention or after the filing of a complaint to enforce a lien under §§ 34-28-10 and 34-28-13, the owner or lessee or tenant of the land described in the notice or complaint may pay into the registry of the court in the county in which the land is located cash equal to the total amount of the notice of intention and the accounts and demands of all persons claiming liens therein under § 34-28-1, 34-28-2, 34-28-3 or 34-28-7, including costs, interest at the statutory rate and reasonable attorney’s fees of the lien holder, or may, in lieu of cash, deposit in the registry of the court the bond of a surety company licensed to do business in this state in the total amount including costs, interest at the statutory rate and reasonable attorney’s fees running to all persons claiming liens under §§ 34-28-10 and 34-28-13, and on proper proof of payment or deposit and on motion of the owner or lessee or tenant, any justice of the superior court shall enter ex parte an order discharging the notice of intention and lis pendens and dismissing the cause as to the owner or lessee or tenant and as to all persons having any title, claim, lease, mortgage, attachment or other lien or encumbrance (other than under § 34-28-1, 34-28-2, 34-28-3 or 34-28-7), and on the entry of the order, the building, canal, turnpike, railroad or other improvement and the land on which the improvement is being or has been constructed, erected, altered, or repaired shall be released and discharged from the notices of intentions and accounts and demands, but the rights of all persons having any title, claim, lease, mortgage, attachment or other lien or encumbrance (other than under § 34-28-1, 34-28-2, 34-28-3 or 34-28-7) shall be the same as if no notices of intention under § 34-28-4 had been mailed or filed and as if no complaint under §§ 34-28-10 and 34-28-13 had been filed. In the event that a payment is made into the registry of court in accordance with this section, any person, having a contract directly with the person making the payment, may be permitted, after notice to all parties under the complaint and after hearing in open court, to withdraw from the registry of court the sum of money due to him or her under the contract, provided that the person making the withdrawal first furnish a bond, payable to the clerk of court, with good and sufficient corporate surety, for the repayment of the amount, or as much thereof as may be necessary to satisfy claims thereinafter allowed by the court.

(b) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, after depositing cash or the bond of a surety company the following shall apply:

(1) In the event that a notice of intention has been recorded, but no complaint filed, the person or other entity claiming the lien shall file the complaint against the surety within the time limits as noted in § 34-28-10. In the event of a cash deposit as noted in § 34-28-17, the complaint shall be brought against the clerk of the respective superior court for any deposit that is posted in the registry within the time limits as noted in § 34-28-10.

(2) In the event that the complaint has been filed with the appropriate superior court, and after depositing cash or the bond of a surety company and discharging the notice of intention and lis pendens, and dismissing the cause as noted in this section, the lien plaintiff shall amend the complaint, to include the surety as defendant within sixty (60) days after the person or entity claiming the lien is given notice of the order in regard to the bond. In the event of a cash deposit as noted in § 34-28-17, the complaint shall be amended and brought against the clerk of the respective superior court for any cash deposit that is posted in the registry within sixty (60) days after the person or entity claiming the lien is given notice of this order in regard to the cash deposit.

(c) The complaint filed against a surety, or the clerk of any respective superior court, pursuant to subsection (b) of this section need not comply with any procedural requirements of §§ 34-28-10, 34-28-11, 34-28-12, 34-28-14, or 34-28-15.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1989–2014 · leading case: Keystone Elevator Co. v. Johnson & Wales Univ., 850 A.2d 912 (R.I. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Keystone Elevator Co. v. Johnson & Wales Univ., 850 A.2d 912 (R.I. 2004). · cites it 10× “That motion was denied in an order issued on August 31, 2001, wherein the motion justice determined that no lis pendens was required because defendants had posted a bond pursuant to § 34-28-17. On September 12, 2001, the motion justice issued an order consolidat *916 ing the…”
Nat'l Refrigeration, Inc. v. Capital Props., Inc., 88 A.3d 1150 (R.I. 2014). · cites it 13× “6 Owner and lessee filed an ex parte motion to discharge the lien upon deposit of a bond with the Registry of the Court, pursuant to § 34-28-17. 7 On March 16, 2009, the Superior Court granted the motion upon the deposit of a bond in the amount of $207,522.”
Gem Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Rossi, 867 A.2d 796 (R.I. 2005). · cites it 6× “Pursuant to § 34-28-17, property owners could deposit a bond (or cash) equivalent to the total amount of the notice of intention (plus associated costs) into the court registry and then petition the Superior Court ex parte to discharge the notice of intention and lis pendens,…”
DeSimone Elec., Inc. v. CMG, INC., 901 A.2d 613 (R.I. 2006). · cites it 2× “The defendants filed the bond pursuant to G.L.1956 § 34-28-17, which states in part that: 5 .”
Roofing Concepts, Inc. v. Barry, 559 A.2d 1059 (R.I. 1989). · cites it 5× “the amount claimed due by the subcontractor, into the registry of court pursuant to § 34-28-17. After completing the pleading and process stages of the action, defendants also filed a third-party complaint against the general contractor.”
F.C.C., Inc. v. Reuter, 867 A.2d 819 (R.I. 2005). “See § 34-28-17. Based on the statute as it was then written, the trial justice in Gem Plumbing determined that the Rhode Island mechanics’ hen statute implicates a significant property interest, and that the statute failed to provide the necessary procedural due process…”
D'Amico v. Morris, 04-123 (2004), W.M. Nos. 04-123, 04-126 (Sup. Ct. R.I. Sept. 13, 2004). “Accordingly, the statute provides a mechanism whereby, even before the deprivation, a hearing may be held.”
R.I. Gen. Laws § 34-28-17(a): 1 case
Nat'l Refrigeration, Inc. v. Capital Props., Inc., 88 A.3d 1150 (R.I. 2014). “6 Owner and lessee filed an ex parte motion to discharge the lien upon deposit of a bond with the Registry of the Court, pursuant to § 34-28-17. 7 On March 16, 2009, the Superior Court granted the motion upon the deposit of a bond in the amount of $207,522.”
R.I. Gen. Laws § 34-28-17(b)(2): 1 case
Nat'l Refrigeration, Inc. v. Capital Props., Inc., 88 A.3d 1150 (R.I. 2014). “6 Owner and lessee filed an ex parte motion to discharge the lien upon deposit of a bond with the Registry of the Court, pursuant to § 34-28-17. 7 On March 16, 2009, the Superior Court granted the motion upon the deposit of a bond in the amount of $207,522.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.