Determining substantial and injurious effect of error
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Determining substantial and injurious effect of error
- Cited for: Determining multifariousness of assigned errors
- Cited for: Determining substantial and injurious effect of error
- Cited for: Determining if a point of error is multifarious
- Cited for: Defining multifariousness of points of error
- Cited for: Analyzing multifarious and overly broad points of error
- Cited for: Determining substantial influence of an error
- Cited for: Distinguishing error impact based on timing of improper statements
Ranked by how often Texas courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Texas opinions citing these pages
- Gary Carson v. State, 515 S.W.3d 372 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2017)
- MCDONALD, MADISON v. State of Texas, No. PD-0147-25 (Tex. Crim. App. Sept. 17, 2026)
- Bruce Allan Tucker v. State of Texas, No. 02-24-00161-CR (Tex. App.—Fort Worth July 24, 2025)
- Braylin Lamont Brown v. State of Texas, No. 02-23-00321-CR (Tex. App.—Fort Worth July 3, 2025)
- HALLMAN, ROBERT F. v. State of Texas, 721 S.W.3d 307 (Tex. Crim. App. 2025)
- Bravion Derrough v. State of Texas, No. 02-24-00281-CR (Tex. App.—Fort Worth June 26, 2025)
- Kentrell Obrien Brumfield v. State of Texas, No. 01-24-00166-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] June 19, 2025)
- Kendarius Williams v. State of Texas, No. 02-24-00176-CR (Tex. App.—Fort Worth May 22, 2025)
- Bluntson, Demond Depree v. State of Texas, 728 S.W.3d 87 (Tex. Crim. App. 2025)
- State of Texas v. Aniceto Turrubiates Sanchez, 722 S.W.3d 58 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2025)
- Miguel Angel Hernandez v. State of Texas, No. 06-24-00154-CR (Tex. App.—Texarkana Mar. 24, 2025)
- Curtis Martin Pyle v. State of Texas, No. 02-24-00155-CR (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Mar. 6, 2025)
- Jimmie Lee Hance, III v. State of Texas, 714 S.W.3d 775 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2025)
- Caylon James Washington v. State of Texas, No. 02-24-00041-CR (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Feb. 20, 2025)
- Daniel Toombs v. State of Texas, No. 01-23-00229-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Dec. 17, 2024)
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Named doctrine
The doctrine as Texas courts name it, with the cases on each side (State Issue Map).
Nearest issues
- 219 opinions
- 13 opinions
- 74 opinions
- 11 opinions
- 21 opinions
- 63 opinions
- 88 opinions
- 9 opinions
Filed under: Harmless and Plain Error Analysis
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law