Texas Codes

Tex. Agric. Code § 74.101 (2026)

Findings And Declaration Of Policy

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 74.101. FINDINGS AND DECLARATION OF POLICY. (a) It is hereby found and declared that:

(1) the insects Anthonomus grandis Boheman, known as the boll weevil, and Pectinophora gossypiella, known as the pink bollworm, are public nuisances and a menace to the cotton industry, and their eradication is a public necessity;

(2) because of the differences in soil conditions, growing seasons, farming techniques, and climate conditions among several areas in the state where cotton is grown, the eradication and suppression of the nuisance can best be accomplished by dividing the cotton-growing areas into separate zones so that integrated pest management programs may be developed for each zone;

(3) there is a need for a quasi-governmental entity acting under the supervision and control of the commissioner whose members are actual cotton growers who would be represented on the board of the entity by directors elected by them to manage eradication and suppression programs and to furnish expertise in the field of insect control and eradication, because such an entity would enhance the interest and participation of cotton growers in the program;

(4) because of the progress made in eradication, investments made by cotton growers in certain areas, the potential injustice to certain cotton growers who have made such investments, and the stage of development of the cotton crops in the statutory eradication zones, an urgent public necessity exists to validate and ratify the assessments, agreements, and obligations of the Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation, Inc., made or incurred by the foundation and related to certain statutory zones;

(5) cotton growers, in partnership with the state and federal governments, have made significant investments toward the eradication of these pests in this state;

(6) it is essential to the well-being of the cotton industry and the agricultural economy of this state that the investments of the cotton growers and the state and federal governments be protected; and

(7) the establishment of a maintenance program to be carried out by the foundation under the supervision of the department is required to protect the investments in eradication.

(b) It is the intent of the legislature that the program of eradication and suppression be carried out with the best available integrated pest management techniques.

(c) The department may recover costs for administration of this subchapter.

Added by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 8, Sec. 1, eff. June 1, 1993. Amended by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 227, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995; Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 463, Sec. 1.01, eff. May 30, 1997.

Amended by:

Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 119 (S.B. 1428), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2005.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1997–2018 · leading case: Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Found., Inc. v. Lewellen, 952 S.W.2d 454 (Tex. 1997).
Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Found., Inc. v. Lewellen, 952 S.W.2d 454 (Tex. 1997). · cites it 7× “The Act declared that "the boll weevil entered Texas from Mexico in 1892 and presents a major economic threat to Texas' cotton crop", TEX. AGRIC. CODE § 74.101(a)(1), that "there exists a need to develop, carry out, and participate in programs of research such as disease and…”
Veigel v. Tex. Boll Weevil Eradication Found., Inc., 549 S.W.3d 193 (Tex. App. 2018). · cites it 3× “, Tex. Agric. Code §§ 74.101, .1021, .1042.”
Parker v. Three Rivers Flying Serv., Inc., 220 S.W.3d 160 (Tex. App. 2007). “See Tex. AgRIC. Code Ann. § 74.101 (Vernon Supp.”
Steve Veigel v. Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Found., Inc. (Tex. App. 2016). · cites it 6× “19, 20, 21, 23 TEX. AGRIC. CODE § 74.1011 ..............”
Steve Veigel v. Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Found., Inc. (Tex. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “6, 14 TEX. AGRIC. CODE § 74.101 ...............”
Amelia S. Gonzales v. Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Found., Inc. (Tex. App. 2003). “See Tex. Agric. Code Ann. §§ 74.101 -.153 (West Supp.”
Joyce & Bruce Parker v. Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Found., Inc. (Tex. App. 2005). “See TEX. AGRIC. CODE ANN. § 74.101 (Vernon 2004).”
Tex. Agric. Code § 74.101(a)(1): 2 cases
Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Found., Inc. v. Lewellen, 952 S.W.2d 454 (Tex. 1997). “The Act declared that "the boll weevil entered Texas from Mexico in 1892 and presents a major economic threat to Texas' cotton crop", TEX. AGRIC. CODE § 74.101(a)(1), that "there exists a need to develop, carry out, and participate in programs of research such as disease and…”
Steve Veigel v. Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Found., Inc. (Tex. App. 2016). “6, 14 TEX. AGRIC. CODE § 74.101 ...............”
Tex. Agric. Code § 74.101(a)(2): 1 case
Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Found., Inc. v. Lewellen, 952 S.W.2d 454 (Tex. 1997). “The Act declared that "the boll weevil entered Texas from Mexico in 1892 and presents a major economic threat to Texas' cotton crop", TEX. AGRIC. CODE § 74.101(a)(1), that "there exists a need to develop, carry out, and participate in programs of research such as disease and…”
Tex. Agric. Code § 74.101(a)(3): 2 cases
Veigel v. Tex. Boll Weevil Eradication Found., Inc., 549 S.W.3d 193 (Tex. App. 2018). “, Tex. Agric. Code §§ 74.101, .1021, .1042.”
Steve Veigel v. Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Found., Inc. (Tex. App. 2016). “19, 20, 21, 23 TEX. AGRIC. CODE § 74.1011 ..............”
Tex. Agric. Code § 74.101(a)(4): 1 case
Steve Veigel v. Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Found., Inc. (Tex. App. 2016). “19, 20, 21, 23 TEX. AGRIC. CODE § 74.1011 ..............”
Tex. Agric. Code § 74.101(c): 1 case
Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Found., Inc. v. Lewellen, 952 S.W.2d 454 (Tex. 1997). “The Act declared that "the boll weevil entered Texas from Mexico in 1892 and presents a major economic threat to Texas' cotton crop", TEX. AGRIC. CODE § 74.101(a)(1), that "there exists a need to develop, carry out, and participate in programs of research such as disease and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.