Sec. 157.376. NO EXISTING ORDER. (a) If the right to possession of a child is not governed by an order, the court in a habeas corpus proceeding involving the right of possession of the child:
(1) shall compel return of the child to the parent if the right of possession is between a parent and a nonparent and a suit affecting the parent-child relationship has not been filed; or
(2) may either compel return of the child or issue temporary orders under Chapter 105 if a suit affecting the parent-child relationship is pending and the parties have received notice of a hearing on temporary orders set for the same time as the habeas corpus proceeding.
(b) The court may not use a habeas corpus proceeding to adjudicate the right of possession of a child between two parents or between two or more nonparents.
Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 20, Sec. 1, eff. April 20, 1995.
SUBCHAPTER I. CLARIFICATION OF ORDERS
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
12
cases, 1996–2020 · leading case:
Blackwell v. Humble, 241 S.W.3d 707 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007).
Blackwell v. Humble, 241 S.W.3d 707 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007).
· cites it 2× “denied) (death of managing conservator ends conservatorship order for possession purposes, and if managing conservator parent dies, "someone must take immediate possession of the children, and the possessory conservator parent's right of immediate possession is superior to…”
In re deFilippi, 235 S.W.3d 319 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2007).
· cites it 4× “4 Tex. Fam.Code ANN. § 157.376 (Vernon 2002).”
Sims v. Adoption All., 922 S.W.2d 213 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996).
· cites it 2× “Finally, we grant Rena Sims' motion for habeas corpus pursuant to Texas Family Code § 157.376 and order that Baby Girl Sims be returned to Rena Sims.”
In re Jones, 263 S.W.3d 120 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006).
· cites it 3× “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 157.376(a) (Vernon 2002).”
In re Johnston, 957 S.W.2d 945 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 1997).
“Tex. Fam.Code Ann. §§ 157.376(a)(2), 167.”
In re PDM, 117 S.W.3d 453 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003).
· cites it 2× “[43] See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 157.376(a)(1)-(2). [44] Maj.”
In re April Caudillo, No. 03-19-00208-CV, 2020 WL 6478417 (Tex. App.—Austin Oct. 28, 2020).
“”); see also Tex. Fam. Code § 157.376 (recognizing that, if no order exists governing right to possession of child, child shall be returned to parent if right of possession is between parent and nonparent and no SAPCR has been filed).”
Walter Lee Hall, Jr. KWI Legal Def. Fund & KWI Commc'ns LLC v. LRT Record Servs., No. 03-07-00465-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Dec. 14, 2007).
“denied) (death of managing conservator ends conservatorship order for possession purposes, and if managing conservator parent dies, “someone must take immediate possession of the children, and the possessory conservator parent’s right of immediate possession is superior to…”
Angela M. Blackwell v. Mark M. Humble, No. 03-05-00118-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Dec. 14, 2007).
“denied) (death of managing conservator ends conservatorship order for possession purposes, and if managing conservator parent dies, "someone must take immediate possession of the children, and the possessory conservator parent's right of immediate possession is superior to…”
Tex. Fam. Code § 157.376(a): 1 case
In re Jones, 263 S.W.3d 120 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006).
“Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 157.376(a) (Vernon 2002).”
Tex. Fam. Code § 157.376(a)(1): 2 cases
In re Jones, 263 S.W.3d 120 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006).
“Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 157.376(a) (Vernon 2002).”
In re PDM, 117 S.W.3d 453 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003).
“[43] See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 157.376(a)(1)-(2). [44] Maj.”
Tex. Fam. Code § 157.376(a)(2): 3 cases
In re deFilippi, 235 S.W.3d 319 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2007).
“4 Tex. Fam.Code ANN. § 157.376 (Vernon 2002).”
In re Jones, 263 S.W.3d 120 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006).
“Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 157.376(a) (Vernon 2002).”
In re Johnston, 957 S.W.2d 945 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 1997).
“Tex. Fam.Code Ann. §§ 157.376(a)(2), 167.”
Tex. Fam. Code § 157.376(a)(l): 1 case
Tex. Fam. Code § 157.376(b): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.