Texas Codes

Tex. Fam. Code § 157.421 (2026)

Clarifying Nonspecific Order

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 157.421. CLARIFYING NONSPECIFIC ORDER. (a) A court may clarify an order rendered by the court in a proceeding under this title if the court finds, on the motion of a party or on the court's own motion, that the order is not specific enough to be enforced by contempt.

(b) The court shall clarify the order by rendering an order that is specific enough to be enforced by contempt.

(c) A clarified order does not affect the finality of the order that it clarifies.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 20, Sec. 1, eff. April 20, 1995.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 38 cases (12 in the last 5 years), 1998–2026 · leading case: In Re the Marriage of Ward, 137 S.W.3d 910 (Tex. App. 2004).
In Re the Marriage of Ward, 137 S.W.3d 910 (Tex. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “” Tex. Fam.Code ANN. § 157.421 (Vernon 2002).”
In Re Alexander, 243 S.W.3d 822 (Tex. App. 2008). “See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 157.421 (Vernon 2002); see also In re A.”
In Interest of Hamilton, 975 S.W.2d 758 (Tex. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. §§ 157.421, 157.423 (Vernon 1996).”
In Re Dryden, 52 S.W.3d 257 (Tex. App. 2001). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 157.421 (Vernon 1996).”
Glass v. Williamson, 137 S.W.3d 114 (Tex. App. 2004). “; Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 157.421 (Vernon 2002) (court may clarify order not specific enough to be enforced by contempt).”
Alan Leslie Williams v. Jo-Ann Williams, 407 S.W.3d 770 (Tex. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “See TEX.FAM.CODE ANN. § 157.421 (West 2008). She also sought attorney’s fees.”
Lundy v. Lundy, 973 S.W.2d 687 (Tex. App. 1998). “Because the court did not render judgment modifying child support, we overrule points of error one, four and five. We affirm the trial court’s judgment denying modification of the child support order and reverse and render as to the judgment “clarifying” the divorce decree.”
in the Interest of A.S.G., J.N.G., & J.D.G., Minor Child., 345 S.W.3d 443 (Tex. App. 2011). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 157.421 (West 2008); In re A.”
McLaurin v. McLaurin, 968 S.W.2d 947 (Tex. App. 1998). “Similarly, an ambiguous order in a family law case may be clarified under Tex Fam. Code Ann. § 157.421 (Vernon 1996) if an order is not specific enough to be enforced by contempt.”
In the Interest of A.C.B., 103 S.W.3d 570 (Tex. App. 2003). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 157.421(a) (Vernon 2002).”
In the Interest of V.M.P., J.R.P. & B.L.P., Child., 185 S.W.3d 531 (Tex. App. 2006). “” Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 157.421 (Vernon 2002).”
In the Interest of R.F.G., 282 S.W.3d 722 (Tex. App. 2009). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 157.421(b) (Vernon 2008).”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 157.421(a) — 8 cases
In the Interest of A.C.B., 103 S.W.3d 570 (Tex. App. 2003). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 157.421(a) (Vernon 2002).”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 157.421(b) — 2 cases
In the Interest of R.F.G., 282 S.W.3d 722 (Tex. App. 2009). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 157.421(b) (Vernon 2008).”
In Re Rfg, 282 S.W.3d 722 (Tex. App. 2009).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.