Texas Codes

Tex. Fam. Code § 2.101 (2026)

General Age Requirement

✓ laws through the 89th Legislature (2025)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 2.101. GENERAL AGE REQUIREMENT. A county clerk may not issue a marriage license if either applicant is under 18 years of age, unless each underage applicant shows that the applicant has been granted by this state or another state a court order removing the disabilities of minority of the applicant for general purposes.

Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 7, Sec. 1, eff. April 17, 1997.

Amended by:

Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 934 (S.B. 1705), Sec. 4, eff. September 1, 2017.

SUBCHAPTER C. CEREMONY AND RETURN OF LICENSE


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 2008–2019 · leading case: Estes v. State, 487 S.W.3d 737 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2016).
Estes v. State, 487 S.W.3d 737 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2016). “See Tex. Fam. Code Ann, § 2.101 (West 2006) (stating that generally, a marriage license may not be issued if either applicant is under eighteen years old).”
Robert Michael Arteaga, Jr. v. State, 511 S.W.3d 675 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2015). · cites it 2× “See TEX. FAMILY CODE ANN. §§ 2.101, 2.102. Therefore, it is not a point that needs to be further considered.”
James Farmer v. State of Florida, 268 So. 3d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019). “§ 36-3-105 (2018); Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 2.101 (West 2017); Utah Code Ann.”
Anderson, Brandon, No. PD-1550-15 (Tex. Dec. 1, 2015). · cites it 2× “20 Texas Statutes TEX. FAM. CODE § 2.101 ..................”
In re Sara Steed, No. 03-08-00235-CV, 2008 WL 2132014 (Tex. App.—Austin May 22, 2008). “Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 2.101 (West 2006), §§ 2.”
In re Sara Steed, No. 03-08-00235-CV (Tex. App.—Austin May 22, 2008). “Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 2.101 (West 2006), §§ 2.”
Arteaga, Robert Michael Jr., No. PD-1648-15 (Tex. Crim. App. Dec. 18, 2015). “See TEX. FAMILY CODE ANN. §§ 2.101, 2.102. Therefore, it is not a point that needs to be further considered.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.