Sec. 6.704. TESTIMONY OF HUSBAND OR WIFE. (a) In a suit for dissolution of a marriage, the husband and wife are competent witnesses for and against each other. A spouse may not be compelled to testify as to a matter that will incriminate the spouse.
(b) If the husband or wife testifies, the court or jury trying the case shall determine the credibility of the witness and the weight to be given the witness's testimony.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 7, Sec. 1, eff. April 17, 1997.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
6
cases (
3 in the last 5 years), 2008–2026 · leading case:
Newberry v. Newberry, 351 S.W.3d 552 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2011).
Newberry v. Newberry, 351 S.W.3d 552 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2011).
“See Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 6.704(b) (West 2006); see Morrison, 713 S.”
in the Interest of Ja.D.Y. & Ju.D.Y., Child., No. 05-16-01412-CV (Tex. App.—Dallas July 16, 2018).
“TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 6.704 (West 2006). If the husband or wife testifies, the court trying the case shall determine the credibility of the witness and the weight to be given to the witness’s testimony.”
Vivek Veagandula v. Sree Rekha Vedullapalli, No. 05-22-01248-CV (Tex. App.—Dallas June 28, 2024).
“TEX. FAM. CODE § 6.704(b). Further, the factfinder is “not “compelled to believe uncontroverted testimony that is suspicious or that comes from an interested or biased source.”
Falah Algaissi v. Taima Abu Qamer, No. 02-25-00212-CV (Tex. App.—Fort Worth May 21, 2026).
“” Tex. Fam. Code § 6.704. When there is conflicting evidence presented at trial, it is the province of the factfinder to resolve such conflicts.”
Tex. Fam. Code § 6.704(b): 4 cases
Newberry v. Newberry, 351 S.W.3d 552 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2011).
“See Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 6.704(b) (West 2006); see Morrison, 713 S.”
Vivek Veagandula v. Sree Rekha Vedullapalli, No. 05-22-01248-CV (Tex. App.—Dallas June 28, 2024).
“TEX. FAM. CODE § 6.704(b). Further, the factfinder is “not “compelled to believe uncontroverted testimony that is suspicious or that comes from an interested or biased source.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.