Tex. Codes » Family Code · TITLE 1. THE MARRIAGE RELATIONSHIP · SUBTITLE C. DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE · CHAPTER 9. POST-DECREE PROCEEDINGS
Texas Codes

Tex. Fam. Code § 9.006 (2026)

Enforcement Of Division Of Property

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 9.006. ENFORCEMENT OF DIVISION OF PROPERTY. (a) Except as provided by this subchapter and by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the court may render further orders to enforce the division of property made or approved in the decree of divorce or annulment to assist in the implementation of or to clarify the prior order.

(b) The court may specify more precisely the manner of effecting the property division previously made or approved if the substantive division of property is not altered or changed.

(c) An order of enforcement does not alter or affect the finality of the decree of divorce or annulment being enforced.

Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 7, Sec. 1, eff. April 17, 1997.

Amended by:

Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 242 (H.B. 389), Sec. 7, eff. September 1, 2013.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 115 cases (32 in the last 5 years), 1997–2026 · leading case: Hagen v. Hagen, 282 S.W.3d 899 (Tex. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hagen v. Hagen, 282 S.W.3d 899 (Tex. 2009). · cites it 2× “TEX. FAM.CODE § 9.006(a) ("[T]he court may render further orders to enforce the division of property made in the decree of divorce or annulment to assist in the implementation of or to clarify the prior order.”
Brown v. Brown, 236 S.W.3d 343 (Tex. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 9.006(a), (b) (Vernon 1998); Cox v.”
Marshall v. Priess, 99 S.W.3d 150 (Tex. App. 2002). · cites it 3× “Tex Fam.Code Ann. § 9.006 (Vernon 1998). 5 .”
Lynch v. Lynch, 540 S.W.3d 107 (Tex. App. 2017). “See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 9.006 (West Supp. 2016), § 9.”
Ashlie Koenig// Brian Blaylock v. Brian Blaylock// Cross-Appellee, Ashlie Koenig, 497 S.W.3d 595 (Tex. App. 2016). “See Tex. Fam.Code §§ 9.006(a) (“[T]he court may render further orders to enforce the division of property made or approved in the decree .”
Frank Pyrtle, III v. Ashanti Johnson Pyrtle, 433 S.W.3d 152 (Tex. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “3d at 922 (citing Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 9.006(a)). The trial court “may specify more precisely the manner of effecting the property division previously made or approved if the substantive division of property is not altered or changed.”
Wright v. Eckhardt, 32 S.W.3d 891 (Tex. App. 2000). · cites it 3× “Compare Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 9.006 (court may enter *895 enforcement or clarification orders regarding property division) with Tex.”
In re Turner, 500 S.W.3d 641 (Tex. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “” 3 Tex. Fam. Code § 9.006. However, a trial court’s “continuing jurisdiction in a family law proceeding does not in itself prevent a judgment from being final.”
Provine v. Provine, 312 S.W.3d 824 (Tex. App. 2009). “” Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 9.006(a). Therein lies the basis for the trial court’s jurisdiction over this matter.”
Snodgrass v. Snodgrass, 332 S.W.3d 653 (Tex. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 9.006 -.014. To the extent that a trial court uses its contempt power, this court lacks appellate jurisdiction to review the trial court’s action, but this court may review the action in a habeas corpus proceeding, if there is a current restraint on…”
Kimsey v. Kimsey, 965 S.W.2d 690 (Tex. App. 1998). “1998) (clarification order in connection with enforcement action); Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 9.008(b) (clarification order in connection with contempt action).”
Howard v. Howard, 490 S.W.3d 179 (Tex. App. 2016). “” Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 9.006 (a) (West Supp.”
Show all 115 citing cases →
— Tex. Fam. Code § 9.006(a) — 45 cases
Hagen v. Hagen, 282 S.W.3d 899 (Tex. 2009). “TEX. FAM.CODE § 9.006(a) ("[T]he court may render further orders to enforce the division of property made in the decree of divorce or annulment to assist in the implementation of or to clarify the prior order.”
Brown v. Brown, 236 S.W.3d 343 (Tex. App. 2007). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 9.006(a), (b) (Vernon 1998); Cox v.”
Ashlie Koenig// Brian Blaylock v. Brian Blaylock// Cross-Appellee, Ashlie Koenig, 497 S.W.3d 595 (Tex. App. 2016). “See Tex. Fam.Code §§ 9.006(a) (“[T]he court may render further orders to enforce the division of property made or approved in the decree .”
Marshall v. Priess, 99 S.W.3d 150 (Tex. App. 2002). “Tex Fam.Code Ann. § 9.006 (Vernon 1998). 5 .”
Provine v. Provine, 312 S.W.3d 824 (Tex. App. 2009). “” Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 9.006(a). Therein lies the basis for the trial court’s jurisdiction over this matter.”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 9.006(b) — 13 cases
Frank Pyrtle, III v. Ashanti Johnson Pyrtle, 433 S.W.3d 152 (Tex. App. 2014). “3d at 922 (citing Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 9.006(a)). The trial court “may specify more precisely the manner of effecting the property division previously made or approved if the substantive division of property is not altered or changed.”
Pursley v. Ussery, 982 S.W.2d 596 (Tex. App. 1998).
Laurie A. Voight v. Kevin J. Voight (Tex. App. 2017).
John T. Gonzales v. Alicia Pounds (Tex. App. 2022).
Jimie Dianne Owsley v. Brian Leon Owsley (Tex. App. 2022).
— Tex. Fam. Code § 9.006(c) — 1 case
In the Matter of the Marriage of Brian Kevin Flanagan & Margaret McKeand Flanagan v. the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2024).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.