Sec. 9.006. ENFORCEMENT OF DIVISION OF PROPERTY. (a) Except as provided by this subchapter and by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the court may render further orders to enforce the division of property made or approved in the decree of divorce or annulment to assist in the implementation of or to clarify the prior order.
(b) The court may specify more precisely the manner of effecting the property division previously made or approved if the substantive division of property is not altered or changed.
(c) An order of enforcement does not alter or affect the finality of the decree of divorce or annulment being enforced.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 7, Sec. 1, eff. April 17, 1997.
Amended by:
Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 242 (H.B. 389), Sec. 7, eff. September 1, 2013.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
115
cases (
32 in the last 5 years), 1997–2026 · leading case:
Hagen v. Hagen, 282 S.W.3d 899 (Tex. 2009).
Hagen v. Hagen, 282 S.W.3d 899 (Tex. 2009).
· cites it 2× “TEX. FAM.CODE § 9.006(a) ("[T]he court may render further orders to enforce the division of property made in the decree of divorce or annulment to assist in the implementation of or to clarify the prior order.”
Brown v. Brown, 236 S.W.3d 343 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007).
· cites it 2× “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 9.006(a), (b) (Vernon 1998); Cox v.”
Marshall v. Priess, 99 S.W.3d 150 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2002).
· cites it 3× “Tex Fam.Code Ann. § 9.006 (Vernon 1998). 5 .”
Lynch v. Lynch, 540 S.W.3d 107 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2017).
“See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 9.006 (West Supp. 2016), § 9.”
Frank Pyrtle, III v. Ashanti Johnson Pyrtle, 433 S.W.3d 152 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2014).
· cites it 2× “3d at 922 (citing Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 9.006(a)). The trial court “may specify more precisely the manner of effecting the property division previously made or approved if the substantive division of property is not altered or changed.”
Wright v. Eckhardt, 32 S.W.3d 891 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2000).
· cites it 3× “Compare Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 9.006 (court may enter *895 enforcement or clarification orders regarding property division) with Tex.”
In re Turner, 500 S.W.3d 641 (Tex. App.—Austin 2016).
· cites it 2× “” 3 Tex. Fam. Code § 9.006. However, a trial court’s “continuing jurisdiction in a family law proceeding does not in itself prevent a judgment from being final.”
Provine v. Provine, 312 S.W.3d 824 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2009).
“” Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 9.006(a). Therein lies the basis for the trial court’s jurisdiction over this matter.”
Snodgrass v. Snodgrass, 332 S.W.3d 653 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2010).
· cites it 2× “See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 9.006 -.014. To the extent that a trial court uses its contempt power, this court lacks appellate jurisdiction to review the trial court’s action, but this court may review the action in a habeas corpus proceeding, if there is a current restraint on…”
Kimsey v. Kimsey, 965 S.W.2d 690 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1998).
“1998) (clarification order in connection with enforcement action); Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 9.008(b) (clarification order in connection with contempt action).”
Howard v. Howard, 490 S.W.3d 179 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2016).
“” Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 9.006 (a) (West Supp.”
Tex. Fam. Code § 9.006(a): 45 cases
Hagen v. Hagen, 282 S.W.3d 899 (Tex. 2009).
“TEX. FAM.CODE § 9.006(a) ("[T]he court may render further orders to enforce the division of property made in the decree of divorce or annulment to assist in the implementation of or to clarify the prior order.”
Brown v. Brown, 236 S.W.3d 343 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007).
“Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 9.006(a), (b) (Vernon 1998); Cox v.”
Marshall v. Priess, 99 S.W.3d 150 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2002).
“Tex Fam.Code Ann. § 9.006 (Vernon 1998). 5 .”
Provine v. Provine, 312 S.W.3d 824 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2009).
“” Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 9.006(a). Therein lies the basis for the trial court’s jurisdiction over this matter.”
Tex. Fam. Code § 9.006(b): 13 cases
Frank Pyrtle, III v. Ashanti Johnson Pyrtle, 433 S.W.3d 152 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2014).
“3d at 922 (citing Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 9.006(a)). The trial court “may specify more precisely the manner of effecting the property division previously made or approved if the substantive division of property is not altered or changed.”
Tex. Fam. Code § 9.006(c): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.