Texas Codes
Tex. Fin. Code § 304.102 (2026)
Prejudgment Interest Required In Certain Cases
✓ laws through the 89th Legislature (2025)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 304.102. PREJUDGMENT INTEREST REQUIRED IN CERTAIN CASES. A judgment in a wrongful death, personal injury, or property damage case earns prejudgment interest.
Amended by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 62, Sec. 7.18(a), eff. Sept. 1, 1999.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 89
cases (11 in the last 5 years), 1998–2025 · leading case: Columbia Hosp. Corp. of Houston v. Moore, 92 S.W.3d 470 (Tex. 2002).
Columbia Hosp. Corp. of Houston v. Moore, 92 S.W.3d 470 (Tex. 2002). “Laws 3091 , 3602 (current version at TEX. FIN. CODE § 304.102). In 1995, the Legislature added subchapter P to the Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement Act, including for the first time a prejudgment interest mandate specifically for health-care liability claims.”
Brainard v. Trinity Universal Ins. Co., 216 S.W.3d 809 (Tex. 2006). “” Tex. Fin.Code § 304.102. Thus, if Brainard obtained a judgment against Premier for past damages resulting from the collision, Premier would be liable for prejudgment interest.”
Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corp. v. Auld, 34 S.W.3d 887 (Tex. 2000). “Laws 3091 , 3602 (now codified at Tex. Fin.Code § 304.102). Horizon argues, however, that prejudgment interest should be included in article 4590i, section 11.”
Jang Won Cho v. Kun Sik Kim, 572 S.W.3d 783 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2019). “” Tex. Fin. Code Ann. § 304.102 (Vernon 2016).”
Centerpoint Energy, Inc. v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 143 S.W.3d 81 (Tex. 2004). “1985), superseded by TEX. FIN.CODE § 304.102.”
Columbia Hosp. Corp. of Houston v. Moore, 43 S.W.3d 553 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001). “Laws 3091 , 3602 (now codified at Tex.Fin.Code Ann. § 304.102 (Vernon Supp.”
Thi of Texas at Lubbock I, LLC v. Perea, 329 S.W.3d 548 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2010). “The jury also awarded Mario, Max, Tony, and George noneconomic damages of $100,000.00 each, for a combined total of $400,000.”
Carl J. Battaglia v. Alexander, 93 S.W.3d 132 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2002). “Laws 3091 , 3602, now codified at Tex. Fin.Code Ann. § 304.102); Sisters of Charity v.”
J & D Towing, LLC v. Am. Alt. Ins. Corp., 478 S.W.3d 649 (Tex. 2016). “Loss-of-use damages are separate and may not be sustained at all, but if they are, fair compensation requires payment for those losses as well as of the date the owner incurs them, also with prejudgment interest on that amount.”
Adams v. H & H Meat Prods., Inc., 41 S.W.3d 762 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2001). “Tex. Fin.Code Ann. §§ 304.102, 304.201 (Vernon Supp.”
Lee v. Lee, 47 S.W.3d 767 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2001). “See Tex. Fin.Code Ann. §§ 304.102, 304.201 (Vernon Supp.”
Durham Transp. Co. v. Beettner, 201 S.W.3d 859 (Tex. App.—Waco 2006). “102 of the Finance Code provided, “A judgment in a wrongful death, personal injury, or property damage case must include prejudgment interest.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.